Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/solanabr/solana-glossary/write-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solanabr/solana-glossaryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/solana-glossary/write-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/solana-glossary/write-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/solana-glossary/write-docs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00487 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
write-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to write-docs — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate comprehensive documentation for Solana blockchain code.
Code to Document
$ARGUMENTS
Related Context
- Solana Programs: See programs/anchor.md for IDL patterns
- Unity/C#: See unity.md for XML doc patterns
- Detailed Templates: See tech-docs-writer agent for full templates
Documentation Strategy
1. Identify Documentation Type
| Type | What to Generate |
|---|---|
| Program | Instructions, accounts, PDAs, errors, security, CU |
| SDK/API | Functions, params, returns, errors, examples |
| Component | Props/properties, events, usage patterns |
| README | Overview, setup, quick start, deployment |
2. Documentation Requirements
For Instructions/Endpoints:
- Accounts table (name, type, description)
- Arguments table (name, type, validation)
- Error codes with descriptions
- Access control notes
- Compute units estimate
- Working code example
For Account Structures:
- Purpose and lifecycle
- Size calculation (include discriminator)
- Field table with types and offsets
- PDA seeds (if applicable)
- Rent cost
For README:
- Program IDs (mainnet/devnet)
- Installation command
- Quick start example
- Instruction summary table
- Security/audit status
3. Best Practices
Do:
- Document ALL public functions/instructions
- Include working code examples
- Explain "why", not just "what"
- Include error scenarios
- Update docs when code changes
Don't:
- Document obvious code
- Leave non-compiling examples
- Skip security considerations
- Forget to document errors
Output
Generate documentation appropriate to the code type:
- Programs: Instruction docs, account docs, error codes
- SDKs: Function docs, type definitions, examples
- Components: Props, events, usage patterns
- Projects: README with setup and deployment
For complex projects, delegate to tech-docs-writer agent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 77 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 208ca443bd83
write-docs is a command published in the GitHub repository solanabr/solana-glossary (19 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 487 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to write-docs, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
contract
Contract-First — define the interface, write contract tests, then implement.
question
Read-only code Q&A. Spawns the code-explorer subagent (Haiku-class) to grep, glob, and read excerpts of the codebase, then synthesizes a cited answer with file:line citations. No plan, no gates, no implementation. Fast. Triggers: "where is X defined", "what calls Y", "how does Z work", "find references to", "explain…
deploy
Deploy Solana program (devnet first, then mainnet).
cleanup
Initialize forked template — setup CLAUDE.md and remove config repo scaffolding.
ci
Hostile audit of a project's CI/CD pipeline definitions (GitHub Actions first-class; GitLab CI and other YAML pipelines by the same principles): assume every workflow is exploitable or silently non-gating until each file is checked against every defect class.
audit-solana
Security audit for Solana programs (Anchor/native).