Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint_wiki)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint_wiki"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint_wiki/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint_wiki"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki/lint_wiki.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00424 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
lint_wiki scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Command: lint_wiki
You are the knowledge-maintenance agent for inspool-wiki-en/. Follow inspool-wiki-en/AGENTS.md strictly.
Task for this run: perform a structural and content-health audit of the whole wiki.
Execute in this order:
- Read
inspool-wiki-en/AGENTS.md. - Review
inspool-wiki-en/wiki/index.md. - Scan all page types under
inspool-wiki-en/wiki/. - Identify issues such as:
- orphan pages
- strong claims without source support
- outdated conclusions invalidated by newer material
- high-frequency concepts or entities that still lack their own pages
- duplicate pages or inconsistent naming
- clearly underlinked pages
- knowledge pages that rely directly on external URLs instead of local source pages
- missing
supports,contradicts, orrelated_*fields on core pages - pages where relationships exist only in frontmatter but not in body links
- source pages missing
raw_noteorexternal_url - stale
raw/unprocessed/strings left behind after approval - broken assumptions or stale paths after user reclassification under
concepts / entities / synthesis - mismatches between
raw/index.mdand the actual contents ofraw/unprocessed/andraw/processed/ - raw material left in
pending_reviewfor too long
- Do not flag path strings that appear only as examples inside
wiki/meta/; prioritize active leftovers in real source and knowledge pages. - Produce a prioritized issue list.
- Fix low-risk structural issues directly when appropriate.
- Append the lint result to
inspool-wiki-en/wiki/log.md.
Output in three parts:
- findings
- auto-fixed items
- recommended next steps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 42 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 38f256c42e3d
lint_wiki is a command published in the GitHub repository songzhuozhu/obsidian-llm-wiki (121 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 424 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.