Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sourjya/kiro-rails. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sourjya/kiro-rails/main/.claude/commands/review-hardcoded-values.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sourjya/kiro-railsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sourjya/kiro-rails/review-hardcoded-values)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sourjya/kiro-rails/review-hardcoded-values"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sourjya/kiro-rails/review-hardcoded-values.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.02496 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01248 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00499 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00250 |
Grade A, and why
review-hardcoded-values scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hardcoded Value Scan
Run this prompt to detect embedded literals, magic values, and environment assumptions in a codebase. Produces a structured findings report with severity, verdict, and remediation - plus a scan manifest proving the scan actually ran.
Part of kiro-rails. This is a manual review prompt. For automated coverage, pair it with the
pre-release-hardcode-checkhook (see "Hook Pairing" below), which runs C1 + C5 on changed files without being asked.
When to Run
- Before any release or version tag
- After a feature branch lands that touches 10+ files
- When onboarding a new or inherited project
- Quarterly as a hygiene check
- Reactively, after a bug is traced to a hardcoded value that should have been config
Scan Categories
C1 - Hardcoded Identifiers (CRITICAL if in prod code)
UUIDs, database IDs, org/tenant/profile identifiers that should be derived at runtime.
Pattern: [0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}
Exclude (acceptable):
- ID generation calls (not hardcoding) - see language appendix
- Type declarations for ID columns - see language appendix
- Dev fixtures and test factories
- Migration revision IDs
Finding = violation if: An ID literal appears in business logic, service code, or endpoint code where it should be looked up from config or the database.
C2 - Hardcoded URLs and Domains (HIGH)
Localhost URLs, specific domains, and port numbers embedded where they should be config-driven.
Patterns:
localhost:\d+or127.0.0.1:\d+- Environment-specific domain patterns - adapt to your naming scheme, e.g.
https?://[a-z-]+\.(dev|staging|prod)\.example\.(com|io) - Specific port numbers in logic (not config defaults)
Exclude (acceptable):
- Settings/config files declaring defaults (e.g.,
database_url: str = "postgresql://...") - CLI tool defaults with an override path (env var or flag)
- Test fixtures and assertions
- Documentation and comments
Finding = violation if: A URL or port is used directly in service/route code instead of reading from config. Or: a test assumes a specific URL that should be derived from the test environment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 290 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A d81fa44a6da4
review-hardcoded-values is a command published in the GitHub repository sourjya/kiro-rails (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,496 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
review-sdk-app
Review and validate a Claude Agent SDK application against best practices.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.