Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/design-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spideynolove/claude-dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/design-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/design-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/design-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01140 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00570 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
design-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Patterns
Suggests design patterns for your code and checks if it follows SOLID principles.
Usage
/design-patterns [analysis_target] [options]
Options
--suggest: Suggest applicable patterns (default)--analyze: Analyze existing pattern usage--refactor: Generate refactoring proposals--solid: Check compliance with SOLID principles--anti-patterns: Detect anti-patterns
Basic Examples
# Analyze patterns for entire project
/design-patterns
# Suggest patterns for specific file
/design-patterns src/services/user.js --suggest
# Check SOLID principles
/design-patterns --solid
# Detect anti-patterns
/design-patterns --anti-patterns
Pattern Categories
1. Creational Patterns
- Factory Pattern: Abstracts object creation
- Builder Pattern: Step-by-step construction of complex objects
- Singleton Pattern: Ensures only one instance exists
- Prototype Pattern: Creates object clones
2. Structural Patterns
- Adapter Pattern: Converts interfaces
- Decorator Pattern: Dynamically adds functionality
- Facade Pattern: Simplifies complex subsystems
- Proxy Pattern: Controls access to objects
3. Behavioral Patterns
- Observer Pattern: Implements event notifications
- Strategy Pattern: Switches algorithms
- Command Pattern: Encapsulates operations
- Iterator Pattern: Traverses collections
SOLID Principles We Check
S - Single Responsibility (one class, one job)
O - Open/Closed (open for extension, closed for modification)
L - Liskov Substitution (subtypes should be replaceable)
I - Interface Segregation (don't force unused methods)
D - Dependency Inversion (depend on abstractions, not details)
Output Example
Design Pattern Analysis Report
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Currently Used Patterns
├─ Observer Pattern: EventEmitter (12 instances)
├─ Factory Pattern: UserFactory (3 instances)
├─ Singleton Pattern: DatabaseConnection (1 instance)
└─ Strategy Pattern: PaymentProcessor (5 instances)
Recommended Patterns
├─ [HIGH] Repository Pattern
│ └─ Where: src/models/*.js
│ └─ Why: Separate data access from business logic
│ └─ Example:
│ class UserRepository {
│ async findById(id) { ... }
│ async save(user) { ... }
│ }
│
├─ [MED] Command Pattern
│ └─ Where: src/api/handlers/*.js
│ └─ Why: Standardize how requests are handled
│
└─ [LOW] Decorator Pattern
└─ Where: src/middleware/*.js
└─ Why: Better way to combine features
SOLID Violations Found
├─ [S] UserService: Does too much (auth AND authorization)
├─ [O] PaymentGateway: Must change code to add payment types
├─ [D] EmailService: Depends on specific classes, not interfaces
└─ [I] IDataStore: Has methods nobody uses
How to Fix
1. Split UserService into AuthService and AuthorizationService
2. Add a PaymentStrategy interface for new payment types
3. Create an EmailService interface
4. Break up IDataStore into smaller interfaces
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 192 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A ee4ba3055245
design-patterns is a command published in the GitHub repository spideynolove/claude-dotfiles (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,140 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.