Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spideynolove/claude-dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/iterate_plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/iterate_plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spideynolove/claude-dotfiles/iterate_plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00454 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00227 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
iterate_plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Iterate Plan
You are tasked with updating an existing implementation plan based on feedback. Be skeptical, surgical, and ground every change in actual codebase reality.
Initial Response
- If NO plan path: ask for it. Tip:
ls -lt .claude/plans/ | head - If plan path but NO feedback: ask what changes to make
- If BOTH provided: proceed immediately to Step 1
Process Steps
Step 1: Read and Understand
- Read the existing plan COMPLETELY (no limit/offset)
- Understand what the user wants to add/modify/remove
- Determine if changes require codebase research
Step 2: Research If Needed
Only spawn research agents if the change requires new technical understanding. When spawning:
- Be specific about which directories to search
- Request file:line references
- Spawn multiple agents in parallel
Step 3: Confirm Before Changing
Based on your feedback, I understand you want to:
- [Change 1]
- [Change 2]
My research found:
- [Relevant constraint or pattern: file:line]
I plan to:
1. [Specific modification]
2. [Specific modification]
Does this align?
Step 4: Make Surgical Edits
- Use Edit tool for precise changes, not rewrites
- Maintain existing structure unless explicitly changing it
- Keep all file:line references accurate
- Maintain the automated vs manual success criteria split
- If adding scope, update "What We're NOT Doing"
Step 5: Present Changes
Updated plan at `.claude/plans/[filename].md`
Changes made:
- [Change 1]
- [Change 2]
Would you like further adjustments?
Guidelines
- Skeptical: Push back on changes that seem problematic; verify feasibility
- Surgical: Precise edits, not rewrites; preserve good content
- No open questions: If a change raises ambiguity, ask before touching the plan
- Interactive: Confirm understanding before acting
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 74 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 215a71e66e32
iterate_plan is a command published in the GitHub repository spideynolove/claude-dotfiles (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 454 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.