Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to squirrelsoft-dev/dev. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/squirrelsoft-dev/dev/main/.claude/commands/squash-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/squirrelsoft-dev/devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/squirrelsoft-dev/dev/squash-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/squirrelsoft-dev/dev/squash-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/squirrelsoft-dev/dev/squash-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/squirrelsoft-dev/dev/squash-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/squirrelsoft-dev/dev/squash-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00722 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
squash-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Squash & PR
Squash all commits on the current branch into a single conventional commit and open a pull request.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS — optional issue number/identifier (e.g. 42, ORG-123)
Steps
-
Detect base branch — run
git branch -aand determine whether the repo usesmainormasteras the default branch. Store as<base>. -
Detect git platform — run
git remote get-url originand classify:- Contains
github.com→ GitHub (useghCLI) - Contains
gitlab.comor a self-hosted GitLab pattern → GitLab (useglabCLI) - Contains
bitbucket.org→ Bitbucket (limited CLI — provide manual URL)
- Contains
-
Resolve issue number — if
$ARGUMENTSis provided, use it as the issue identifier. Otherwise, extract from the current branch name using common patterns:fix/123-description→123feature/ORG-123-description→ORG-123issue-42→42- If no issue number can be extracted, proceed without one.
-
Fetch issue context (if an issue number was resolved):
- GitHub:
gh issue view <number> - GitLab:
glab issue view <number> - Bitbucket: skip (use branch name and commit context instead)
Use the issue title and description to inform the commit message.
- GitHub:
-
Analyze branch commits — run
git log --oneline <base>..HEADto understand the full scope of work done on this branch. -
Analyze the diff — run
git diff <base>...HEADto understand exactly what changed. -
Generate conventional commit message using all context gathered:
type(scope): description (#issue) body — what changed and why, summarizing the full branch work Closes #issueFollow the same rules as
/commit: imperative, lowercase description, no period. Scope is the primary module/feature affected. -
Squash commits — run:
git reset --soft $(git merge-base <base> HEAD)Then commit all staged changes with the generated message using
git commit -m "<message>".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 1a3609d2031d
squash-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository squirrelsoft-dev/dev (17 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 722 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other commands, from other repositories
gsd:quick
Execute a quick task with GSD guarantees (atomic commits, state tracking) but skip optional agents.
standup
Review my git commits from the past workday and generate a standup summary.
gsd:remove-phase
Remove a future phase from roadmap and renumber subsequent phases.
company-repo
Gestionar el repositorio Company Savia: crear, conectar, estado, sincronizar. El repositorio compartido de la empresa para conocimiento, mensajería y estado.
iterate
Execute a single Ralph loop iteration - complete one work unit from tasks.md with proper commits and progress tracking.
weekly-summary
Generate weekly work summary from git activity.