Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/srnichols/plan-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-graphql-resolver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-graphql-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-graphql-resolver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-graphql-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-graphql-resolver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00821 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
new-graphql-resolver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create New GraphQL Resolver
Scaffold a GraphQL resolver using Hot Chocolate with query, mutation, and DataLoader patterns.
Required Pattern
Query Resolver
[QueryType]
public class {EntityName}Queries
{
[UseProjection]
[UseFiltering]
[UseSorting]
public IQueryable<{EntityName}> Get{EntityName}s(
[Service] I{EntityName}Repository repository)
{
return repository.GetAll();
}
public async Task<{EntityName}?> Get{EntityName}ById(
Guid id,
[Service] I{EntityName}Repository repository,
CancellationToken ct)
{
return await repository.GetByIdAsync(id, ct);
}
}
Mutation Resolver
[MutationType]
public class {EntityName}Mutations
{
public async Task<{EntityName}> Create{EntityName}(
Create{EntityName}Input input,
[Service] I{EntityName}Service service,
CancellationToken ct)
{
return await service.CreateAsync(input, ct);
}
public async Task<{EntityName}> Update{EntityName}(
Guid id,
Update{EntityName}Input input,
[Service] I{EntityName}Service service,
CancellationToken ct)
{
return await service.UpdateAsync(id, input, ct);
}
}
Input Types
public record Create{EntityName}Input(
[property: MaxLength(200)] string Name,
string? Description);
public record Update{EntityName}Input(
[property: MaxLength(200)] string Name,
string? Description);
DataLoader (N+1 Prevention)
public class {EntityName}ByIdDataLoader : BatchDataLoader<Guid, {EntityName}>
{
private readonly I{EntityName}Repository _repository;
public {EntityName}ByIdDataLoader(
I{EntityName}Repository repository,
IBatchScheduler scheduler)
: base(scheduler)
{
_repository = repository;
}
protected override async Task<IReadOnlyDictionary<Guid, {EntityName}>> LoadBatchAsync(
IReadOnlyList<Guid> keys, CancellationToken ct)
{
var items = await _repository.GetByIdsAsync(keys, ct);
return items.ToDictionary(x => x.Id);
}
}
// Usage in a type extension
[ExtendObjectType(typeof(Order))]
public class OrderTypeExtension
{
public async Task<{EntityName}?> Get{EntityName}(
[Parent] Order order,
{EntityName}ByIdDataLoader loader,
CancellationToken ct)
{
return await loader.LoadAsync(order.{EntityName}Id, ct);
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 133 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a193b5d0844b
new-graphql-resolver is a command published in the GitHub repository srnichols/plan-forge (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 821 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.