Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/srnichols/plan-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-pester-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-pester-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-pester-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-pester-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/new-pester-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01109 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
new-pester-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create New Pester Test
Scaffold a Pester 6 test file following the *.Tests.ps1 naming convention.
Required Information
Before generating, ask for:
- What are we testing? — a PowerShell function, a deployed Azure resource, or a pipeline script?
- Unit or integration? — unit mocks Az cmdlets; integration tests run against real Azure
- Function/script name — used for
Describeblock naming and file naming - What should it validate? — list success cases, failure/edge cases
Unit Test Template
# tests/unit/{FunctionName}.Tests.ps1
#Requires -Modules @{ ModuleName = 'Pester'; ModuleVersion = '6.2.0' }
BeforeAll {
# Import the function under test via dot-sourcing
. $PSScriptRoot/../../modules/{ModuleName}/{FunctionName}.ps1
# Stub out Az cmdlets — never hit real Azure in unit tests
Mock New-AzResourceGroupDeployment {
[PSCustomObject]@{
DeploymentName = 'mock-deployment'
ProvisioningState = 'Succeeded'
Outputs = @{}
}
}
}
Describe '{FunctionName}' {
Context 'Given valid input' {
It 'calls the Az cmdlet once with correct parameters' {
{FunctionName} -ParameterA 'value-a' -ParameterB 'value-b'
Should -Invoke New-AzResourceGroupDeployment -Times 1 -ParameterFilter {
$ResourceGroupName -eq 'expected-rg'
}
}
It 'returns a succeeded result' {
$result = {FunctionName} -ParameterA 'value-a' -ParameterB 'value-b'
$result.ProvisioningState | Should -Be 'Succeeded'
}
}
Context 'Given invalid input' {
It 'throws when required parameter is missing' {
{ {FunctionName} -ParameterB 'value-b' } | Should -Throw
}
It 'throws when environment is invalid' {
{ {FunctionName} -ParameterA 'invalid' } | Should -Throw -ExpectedMessage '*must be one of*'
}
}
}
Integration Test Template
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed deb3229eaff1
- 1mo ago First seen · 136 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 555aee5623dc
new-pester-test is a command published in the GitHub repository srnichols/plan-forge (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,109 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
unit-tests
Act as a top-tier software engineer with serious testing skills.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.