Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/srnichols/plan-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/step0-specify-feature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/step0-specify-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/step0-specify-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/step0-specify-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/srnichols/plan-forge/step0-specify-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.03321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01661 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00664 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00332 |
Grade A, and why
step0-specify-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 327 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Step 0: Specify Feature
Pipeline: Step 0 (optional, recommended) — Run before Steps 1–5
Model suggestion: Claude (best at conversational interviews and ambiguity detection)
When: You have a rough idea for a feature but haven't written a plan yet
Next Step: Write a*-PLAN.md, thenstep1-preflight-check.prompt.md
Output: A specification section to include as front matter in your Phase Plan
Replace <FEATURE-NAME> with a short name for the feature you're building.
Act as a SPECIFICATION AGENT helping me define before any technical planning begins.
Your job is to help me describe WHAT I want to build and WHY — not HOW to build it. Ask me structured questions to surface requirements I may not have thought about. For anything I'm unsure of, tag it with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: description] — these markers MUST be resolved before the plan can be hardened (Step 2 will block on them).
FIRST: Check for Prior Context
-
Check OpenBrain (if configured):
search_thoughts("<FEATURE-NAME>", project: "<YOUR PROJECT NAME>")— load prior decisions, gotchas, and lessons about this feature area. If results found, reference them in the specification. -
Check LiveGuard memories: Read
.forge/liveguard-memories.jsonlif it exists — recent drift findings, incident history, and health snapshots may provide relevant context. -
Check Spec Kit Artifacts:
Before asking any questions, scan the project for Spec Kit artifacts:
- Check if
specs/directory exists (Spec Kit feature directory) - Check if
memory/constitution.mdexists (Spec Kit project constitution) - Check if any
specs/*/spec.mdorspecs/*/plan.mdfiles exist
If Spec Kit artifacts are found:
"I found Spec Kit artifacts in this project:
specs/<feature>/spec.md— feature specificationspecs/<feature>/plan.md— implementation planmemory/constitution.md— project constitutionPlan Forge can import these directly:
- Import spec → Skip the interview, map spec.md sections to Plan Forge format
- Import plan → Convert plan.md into a hardened execution contract (Phase Plan)
- Import constitution → Convert to
docs/plans/PROJECT-PRINCIPLES.md- Start fresh → Ignore Spec Kit files and run the full interview
Which would you like?"
CLI shortcut:
pforge crucible import --from=spec-kitruns all four import steps non-interactively and emits a ready-to-run Phase Plan with Crucible frontmatter already applied.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 327 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 72dc8f2272db
step0-specify-feature is a command published in the GitHub repository srnichols/plan-forge (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 3,321 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
modernization-flow
Workflow for converting, modernizing, upgrading, or re-architecting code (e.g. C++→Java, monolith→microservices), etc.
init-workspace-flow-discovery
Phase 3 Discovery of init-workspace-flow.
ui-aqa-flow-test-report-analysis
Phase 7 Test Report Analysis of ui-aqa-flow.
ui-aqa-flow-code-analysis
Phase 3 Code Analysis of ui-aqa-flow.
adhoc-flow
Workflow for the rest of tasks: lightweight documentation, build, track, synchronize, etc.