Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sruja-ai/srujaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sruja-ai/sruja/sruja-plan-feature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sruja-ai/sruja/sruja-plan-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sruja-ai/sruja/sruja-plan-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sruja-ai/sruja/sruja-plan-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sruja-ai/sruja/sruja-plan-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00339 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
sruja-plan-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are planning a single task in the Sruja workspace. Obey AGENTS.md and two-layer planning: this command is task layer only (files, order, validation)—not full product scope.
Inputs the user should provide (ask if missing):
- Issue / goal statement (or link)
- Optional: target file or crate
Steps:
-
Confirm scope layer is already settled (what ships, what is out of scope). If unclear, stop and ask—do not invent product scope.
-
Inspect only the code paths needed: search, then read relevant modules. Prefer
sruja focus/ MCP over bulk reads. -
Produce one plan artifact with this structure (markdown, save where the user wants—often PR branch
plan.mdor issue comment):- Summary — One paragraph.
- User-visible behavior — Bullets.
- Files to create or change — Path list with one-line rationale each.
- Task order — Numbered steps (dependencies first).
- Validation — Exact commands: at minimum
just check(ormake check) for Rust; add crate-scoped tests if they said so. For.sruja, includesruja lint <file>. - Risks / unknowns — What could invalidate the plan.
-
Ask the user to review and freeze the plan before implementation.
Do not start large refactors in this step unless the user explicitly asked for code in the same turn.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 28 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A c88d8ff59725
sruja-plan-feature is a command published in the GitHub repository sruja-ai/sruja (23 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 339 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
arrange-workspace-flow-technical-context
Phase 4 Technical context of arrange-workspace-flow.
plan
Planning, brainstorming, architecture, and refactoring strategies.
xray
Zero-config X-ray of this repo's real architecture — map, living docs, and evolution feed. No rules required.
check
Fail on NET-NEW architecture violations only — the same ratchet ArchSteer runs in CI, run right now.
review-drift
Walk the VibeFrame drift inbox and resolve each finding (fix / accept / dismiss).
plan-feature
Plan and implement a feature through the VibeFrame model (context → declare → implement → link → validate).