Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ssheleg/super-uxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ssheleg/super-ux/ux-foundation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ssheleg/super-ux/ux-foundation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ssheleg/super-ux/ux-foundation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00149 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
ux-foundation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the ux-foundation skill.
Pick the workflow from state: no docs/ux/foundation.md → Init (interview
for greenfield, reverse for an existing product); exists and $ARGUMENTS
describes new knowledge → Update; exists and consistency is the question →
Validate.
After any change, run the cascade check: list scenarios tracing to changed
IDs and hand them to the ux-scenarios skill in the same session.
Context from the user: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 17 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 5eb6f6188d3d
ux-foundation is a command published in the GitHub repository ssheleg/super-ux (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 149 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ux-fix
Opt-in fix loop. Reads the latest report from .ux/, validates working tree, and applies findings as atomic commits via the right sub-agents. Triggers on "fix the findings", "apply the fixes", or "run the fix loop". Use when applying findings from a previous audit / copy / a11y / motion / polish report, the user says…
ux-motion
Animation and motion rubric. Checks timing, easing, meaning, reduced-motion compliance, and performance for every animation on a surface. Triggers on "motion check", "are the animations good", or "fix the motion". Use when auditing motion or animations, checking durations / easing / reduced-motion / performance, is…
ux-case-study
Generate a project case study in pure-monochrome editorial format. Triggers on "write a case study", "case study this project", "do the wrap-up doc". Use when writing a project case study, shipping a publishable Wfrah-editorial document, ending a project with a case-study artifact, producing the (A)–(G) section format…
ux-component
Generate a single component (button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart) from a spec. Triggers on "build a [component]", "create a pricing card", "make a modal", "add a navbar". Use when generating a single component, the user says "create a [button/modal/navbar/card/table/form/chart]", embedded into an…
ux-copy
Microcopy review and rewrite against the voice rubric. Produces a before/after table with severity per string and a clean rewrite block. Triggers on "review the copy", "fix the microcopy", "the error messages are bad", or "rewrite this". Use when reviewing or rewriting microcopy, fixing error messages that sound like…
ux-critique
Open-ended taste call on a specific surface. Not a structured audit — a designer's opinion. Returns 3 wins, 3 misses, and 1 strategic move. Triggers on "what do you think", "is this good", "critique this", or "honest take". Use when open-ended taste call, the user asks "what do you think", design review without a…