Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/starslingdev/skillsnpx agentmods add commands/starslingdev/skills/registry-securityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/starslingdev/skills/registry-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/starslingdev/skills/registry-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/starslingdev/skills/registry-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/starslingdev/skills/registry-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/starslingdev/skills/registry-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
registry-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the maintainer-only skills-registry-security skill against $ARGUMENTS
(default starslingdev/skills/ci-secure if no target is given).
Read maintainers/skills-registry-security/SKILL.md and follow it. In short:
-
Run the audit and read the
NEXT ACTIONverdict:python3 maintainers/skills-registry-security/scripts/registry_audit.py <owner/repo/skill> --repo-root .Add
--no-installfor the ~3s check instead of ~40s. -
Act on the verdict:
RESOLVED— the badge is clean. Report and stop.ACTION_REQUIRED— a cited literal is still in HEAD. It is a real finding; surface it with the code and stop. Do not fix silently.MONITOR— the finding is stale, there is nothing to patch, and the registry's own ~daily re-audit is what clears it. Arm the unattended watch per SKILL.md's "Drive it to green unattended" section and report only on a decision change.DISAGREEMENT/UNVERIFIED— surfaces disagree or could not be classified. Re-check before trusting; never report a badge as clean.
Rails from SKILL.md that always apply: never rename or re-slug a published skill, never auto-file an issue on the registry's repo, and keep any research subagents read-only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 8041d7222e73
registry-security is a command published in the GitHub repository starslingdev/skills (80 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 364 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
registry-security compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| registry-securitystarslingdev/skills | Command | 80 | yesterday | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| dart-fix-cidartsim/dart | Command | 1.2k | yesterday | BSD-2-Clause | A | 6 | Claude Code |
| domainsgotempsh/temps | Command | 903 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| accessgotempsh/temps | Command | 903 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| check-release-healthopenshift-eng/ai-helpers | Command | 122 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| release-managerruvnet/agentic-flow | Command | 838 | yesterday | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |