fix-pr-comments-loop

A command that runs the automated pull-request comment-fixing process on the current branch's pull request, or on a specified pull request number. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes awaiting review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to drive a pull request through fixing comments, verification, pushing changes, and repeated review requests until reviewers approve it or a safety limit is reached.
Why use it?
It automates repeated review-and-fix cycles instead of requiring you to start each cycle manually.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/stilero/claude-plugins/fix-pr-comments-loop
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stilero/claude-plugins
Per session 33 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 296 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00033 $0.00296
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00148
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00059
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00030

Measured 2d ago against content hash 1c1f12b3cbf6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fix-pr-comments-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/fix-pr-comments-loop/commands/fix-pr-comments-loop.md · 21 lines

What it actually says

Fix PR Comments Loop

FIRST: Load the fix-pr-comments-loop skill using the Skill tool to understand what you are expected to do and follow the instructions exactly.

This command is a thin wrapper around the fix-pr-comments-loop skill. The skill orchestrates pr-comment-fixer:fix-issues and hardcore-code-reviewer:hardcore-code-reviewer into a single autonomous outer loop that drives a PR to a clean review state.

If $ARGUMENTS is provided:

  • User has given a specific Pull Request number: $ARGUMENTS
  • Use this Pull Request number when running the fix-pr-comments-loop skill instead of inferring it from the current branch.

If $ARGUMENTS is empty:

  • Infer the PR from the current branch as documented in the fix-pr-comments-loop skill.
  • If no open PR exists for the current branch, fail fast with a clear message (per the skill's no-open-PR contract).
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 21 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 1c1f12b3cbf6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fix-pr-comments-loop is a command published in the GitHub repository stilero/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 296 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.