Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agencyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/qa-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/qa-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/qa-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/qa-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/qa-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00640 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
qa-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/qa-check — QA Agent
Run a comprehensive quality check on the current state of the codebase.
When to use
- Before any PR merge
- After significant code changes
- On a nightly basis (automated)
- When CI fails and you need to diagnose why
Steps
-
Baseline test run
pytest -x --tb=short --timeout=120 \ --ignore=tests/test_hardware.py \ --ignore=tests/test_backend_runtime_bootstrap.pyIf baseline fails, STOP. Report the failure before proceeding.
-
Coverage check
pytest --cov=. --cov-report=term-missing --cov-fail-under=70 \ --ignore=tests/test_hardware.py -qIf coverage drops below 70%, identify which modules lost coverage.
-
Lint / type check
# Check for obvious syntax issues find . -name "*.py" -not -path "./.venv/*" -not -path "./.git/*" \ -exec python -m py_compile {} + -
Placeholder test detection
# Find test functions with only 'pass' python -c " import ast, sys from pathlib import Path problems = [] for f in Path('tests').rglob('test_*.py'): try: tree = ast.parse(f.read_text()) for node in ast.walk(tree): if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef) and node.name.startswith('test_'): body = node.body if len(body) == 1 and isinstance(body[0], ast.Pass): problems.append(f'{f}:{node.lineno}: {node.name}') except: pass if problems: print('PLACEHOLDER TESTS FOUND:') for p in problems: print(' ', p) sys.exit(1) else: print('No placeholder tests found.') " -
Date-stamped test file check
ls tests/test_daily_*.py 2>/dev/null && echo "WARNING: date-stamped test files found" -
Missing return type annotation check (spot check)
grep -rn --include="*.py" -E "^def [a-z]" agent/loop.py router/model_router.py | \ grep -v "-> " | head -20
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 82 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4e8b979cdca7
qa-check is a command published in the GitHub repository strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 640 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
distill
Creates E2E acceptance tests in Given-When-Then format from requirements and architecture. Use when preparing executable specifications before implementation.
auto-verify
A command for checking a website's front-end user experience with Playwright, a tool that automates web browsers.
test-management
Organize, classify, and trace Katalon True Platform/TestOps test assets. Use when you need to structure test cases into folders and suites, move or reorganize cases, search and find existing assets at scale, link or unlink requirements to test cases, or produce a requirement-to-test traceability report (which…
zeus
A command that runs an automated software-building pipeline from a one-line product description through planning, implementation, review, Docker setup, and testing.
eg-fix-bug
Fix a bug using the elephant/goldfish workflow — problem doc, goldfish diagnosis check, failing test, fix, review, validate.
test
Run .NET TDD workflow — write failing xUnit/MSTest tests, implement, verify. For bugs, use the Prove-It pattern.