Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sudo-tee/opencode.nvimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sudo-tee/opencode.nvim/agents)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sudo-tee/opencode.nvim/agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sudo-tee/opencode.nvim/agents/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sudo-tee/opencode.nvim/agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sudo-tee/opencode.nvim/agents.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00339 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
AGENTS scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Commands
Execution infrastructure, not feature surface. Read parse.lua, init.lua, dispatch.lua before editing.
Pipeline and Rules
- All entries (
:Opencode, keymap, API, slash): parse/build intent →commands.bind_action_context(...)→dispatch.execute(ctx)→ hooks. parse.lua: structured intent only; never bind execute functions.init.lua: bind actions.dispatch.lua: lifecycle + error normalization.- Single bind/execute points above. No
dispatch.run,route.execute, fake parse wrappers, alternate bind paths, or per-entry semantic forks. - Entry adapters use
commands.build_parsed_intent(...)+commands.execute_parsed_intent(...); no fallback branches checking whether these exist. - Hooks:
before,after,error,finally. Global:command = '*'or omitted; scoped:command = 'run'or{'run','review'}. Handlers must be side-effect aware and idempotent. - Keep hook/action semantics consistent across entries. Preserve notify behavior unless explicitly requested.
- Prefer removing duplicate glue. Change handlers for feature behavior; change infrastructure only when all entries must change together.
Regression Tests
./run_tests.sh -t tests/unit/commands_dispatch_spec.lua./run_tests.sh -t tests/unit/commands_parse_spec.lua./run_tests.sh -t tests/unit/commands/command_axis_spec.lua./run_tests.sh -t tests/unit/keymap_spec.lua./run_tests.sh -t tests/unit/api_spec.lua -f "command routing"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -58 lines d63af318e608
- 2mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c2a9d0516afe
AGENTS is a command published in the GitHub repository sudo-tee/opencode.nvim (976 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 339 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
AGENTS compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGENTSsudo-tee/opencode.nvim | Command | 976 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.fixgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |