Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/sumulige/sumulige-claude/verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sumulige/sumulige-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sumulige/sumulige-claude/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sumulige/sumulige-claude/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sumulige/sumulige-claude/verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01633 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00816 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00327 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 283 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/verify - Pre-PR Verification Loop
Run all quality checks to ensure code is ready for PR submission.
Usage
/verify # Run all 5 phases
/verify --quick # Skip coverage check (faster)
/verify --fix # Auto-fix formatting issues before check
Verification Phases
Execute each phase sequentially. If a blocking phase fails, stop and fix before continuing.
Phase 1: Sanity Check (Build)
Verify the CLI loads without errors:
node cli.js --version
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Version displayed | PASS |
| Error thrown | FAIL (blocking) |
Phase 2: Format Check (Lint)
Check code formatting with Prettier:
npx prettier --check "**/*.{js,cjs,mjs,json,md}" --ignore-path .gitignore
If issues found (--fix mode):
npx prettier --write "**/*.{js,cjs,mjs,json,md}" --ignore-path .gitignore
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| All files formatted | PASS |
| Files need formatting | WARN (non-blocking, fixable) |
Phase 3: Test Suite
Run all tests with coverage:
npm run test:coverage
Coverage Requirements (from .claude/rules/testing.md):
| Code Type | Minimum |
|---|---|
| General business logic | 80% |
| Financial/Auth/Security | 100% |
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Tests pass, coverage >= 80% | PASS |
| Tests pass, coverage < 80% | FAIL (blocking) |
| Tests fail | FAIL (blocking) |
For --quick mode, run without coverage:
npm test
Phase 4: Security Scan
Scan for hardcoded secrets and debugging statements:
4.1 Check for console.log in production code:
grep -rn "console\.log\|console\.debug\|console\.info" --include="*.js" --include="*.cjs" --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=tests --exclude-dir=coverage lib/ cli.js 2>/dev/null || echo "No console logs found"
4.2 Check for hardcoded secrets:
grep -rn "sk-[a-zA-Z0-9]\{20,\}\|ghp_[a-zA-Z0-9]\{36\}\|AKIA[A-Z0-9]\{16\}" --include="*.js" --include="*.cjs" --exclude-dir=node_modules lib/ cli.js 2>/dev/null || echo "No secrets found"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 283 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 300f9c05cfbb
verify is a command published in the GitHub repository sumulige/sumulige-claude (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,633 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
doctor
Run read-only health checks on the Kobiton automate plugin (CLI, credentials, profile).
speckit.checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
speckit.analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
speckit.plan
Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
handoff
Force a session catchup or a memory promotion outside the hook lifecycle. Default is catchup (read-only); promote is HITL gated.
gate
You are the Gate System controller. Execute quality gate reviews based on the user's request.