Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sun2443/designer-skillsnpx agentmods add commands/sun2443/designer-skills/fill-formWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sun2443/designer-skills/fill-form)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sun2443/designer-skills/fill-form"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sun2443/designer-skills/fill-form/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sun2443/designer-skills/fill-form"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sun2443/designer-skills/fill-form.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00805 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
fill-form scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to fill-form — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
If you need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Fill Form
Help the user complete a fillable PDF form in the live viewer. Unlike programmatic form tools, this gives the user direct visual feedback on every field as it's filled, with easy undo/edit in the viewer.
Why use this instead of programmatic form filling
- Visual confirmation — the user sees each value land in the right box, not just a success message
- Unnamed/unlabeled fields — many real-world PDFs have fields with
machine names like
Text1,Field_7, or no name at all. The label ("Date of Birth", "SSN") is printed next to the field on the rendered page, not in the field metadata. Useget_screenshotto see what each field actually is, then fill by name. - Easy correction — the user can edit or clear any field directly
in the viewer, or ask you to
fill_formagain with new values
Two approaches
User-driven (simple, well-labeled forms)
Call display_pdf with elicit_form_inputs: true. The server detects
form fields and prompts the user to enter values before the viewer
opens. The filled PDF is then displayed.
AI-assisted (complex forms, unnamed fields, or when you have context)
display_pdf(without elicit) — inspect returnedformFields(name, type, page, bounding box)- If field names are cryptic (
Text1,Field_7), useinteract→get_screenshotof each page with fields. Look at the visual labels next to each bounding box to understand what each field is. - For each field, either:
- Infer the value from conversation context (name, date, email)
- Ask the user, describing the field by its visual label ("the 'Date of Birth' box on page 1")
interact→fill_formwithfields: [{name, value}, ...]interact→get_screenshotof each filled page- Show the user, ask them to confirm or edit
Example
User: Help me fill out this W-9
You:
display_pdf→ formFields:f1_1,f1_2,f1_3,c1_1, ... (cryptic names)You:
interact→get_screenshotpage 1 → seef1_1is next to "Name",f1_2is "Business name",c1_1is the "Individual" checkboxYou: "I can see Name, Business name, Address, TIN, and tax classification checkboxes. I'll fill Name and Date from what I know — what's your TIN and business address?"
After answers:
interact→fill_form+get_screenshotYou: "Here's the filled form [screenshot]. The signature line is still blank — want to add your signature with
/pdf-viewer:sign?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 74 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 787ca13d2032
fill-form is a command published in the GitHub repository sun2443/designer-skills (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 805 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to fill-form, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
open
Open a PDF in the in-app viewer panel.
brief-compliance-check
Check a LaTeX coursework submission against the requirements in a supplied PDF assessment brief. Use when verifying format, required sections, word limits, or deliverables before submission. Not for general prose proofreading; use $proofread.
render-figures
Compile all .tex and .typ figure files in a directory.
docs
Document delivery with export to PPTX, DOCX, PDF formats.
pipeline-minutar-pdf
Pipeline completo de sentença judicial a partir de PDF (conversão, linha-tempo, relatório, análise, fundamentação, merge).
cti-report
Render case deliverables — relationship graph (PNG/SVG/Mermaid) and a polished PDF/DOCX assessment. Usage: /cti-report [--graph|--pdf].