Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_plugin/sc-reflectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_PluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_plugin/sc-reflect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_plugin/sc-reflect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_plugin/sc-reflect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00744 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
reflect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to reflect — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/sc:sc:sc:reflect - Task Reflection and Validation
Triggers
- Task completion requiring validation and quality assessment
- Session progress analysis and reflection on work accomplished
- Cross-session learning and insight capture for project improvement
- Quality gates requiring comprehensive task adherence verification
Usage
/sc:sc:reflect [--type task|session|completion] [--analyze] [--validate]
Behavioral Flow
- Analyze: Examine current task state and session progress using Serena reflection tools
- Validate: Assess task adherence, completion quality, and requirement fulfillment
- Reflect: Apply deep analysis of collected information and session insights
- Document: Update session metadata and capture learning insights
- Optimize: Provide recommendations for process improvement and quality enhancement
Key behaviors:
- Serena MCP integration for comprehensive reflection analysis and task validation
- Bridge between TodoWrite patterns and advanced Serena analysis capabilities
- Session lifecycle integration with cross-session persistence and learning capture
- Performance-critical operations with <200ms core reflection and validation
MCP Integration
- Serena MCP: Mandatory integration for reflection analysis, task validation, and session metadata
- Reflection Tools: think_about_task_adherence, think_about_collected_information, think_about_whether_you_are_done
- Memory Operations: Cross-session persistence with read_memory, write_memory, list_memories
- Performance Critical: <200ms for core reflection operations, <1s for checkpoint creation
Tool Coordination
- TodoRead/TodoWrite: Bridge between traditional task management and advanced reflection analysis
- think_about_task_adherence: Validates current approach against project goals and session objectives
- think_about_collected_information: Analyzes session work and information gathering completeness
- think_about_whether_you_are_done: Evaluates task completion criteria and remaining work identification
- Memory Tools: Session metadata updates and cross-session learning capture
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 89 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A b4e213e4eeb4
reflect is a command published in the GitHub repository SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Plugin (55 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 744 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to reflect, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
estimate
Provide development estimates for tasks, features, or projects with intelligent analysis.
index
Generate comprehensive project documentation and knowledge base with intelligent organization.
reflect
Task reflection and validation using Serena MCP analysis capabilities.
select-tool
Intelligent MCP tool selection based on complexity scoring and operation analysis.
spawn
Meta-system task orchestration with intelligent breakdown and delegation.
task
Execute complex tasks with intelligent workflow management and delegation.