Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/ultracodegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/ultracode)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/ultracode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows/ultracode.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00099 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00049 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
ultracode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use the odw_ultracode tool to toggle ultracode mode for this project. Report the new state. While ultracode is ON, the open-dynamic-workflows plugin treats every substantive prompt as a workflow trigger: it plans first (task graph → topology → roles → strategy), shows the plan, and orchestrates agents through the odw daemon when available.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 7 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A bdef948d63db
ultracode is a command published in the GitHub repository Suraj1235/open-dynamic-workflows (36 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 99 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
optimize
Show TokenJam's savings/optimize report — where quota is going and what's recoverable. Equivalent to running tj optimize.
status
Show TokenJam's current status for every tracked agent — token usage, cost today, and active alerts. Equivalent to running tj status.
uninstall
Remove TokenJam's Claude Code integration — unwires the statusline, hooks, and OTel env vars that /onboard set up. Equivalent to running tj uninstall --yes. Does not remove the plugin itself.
doctor
Run TokenJam's health check — config, ingest endpoint, and storage. Equivalent to running tj doctor.
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.