Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/swarm-ai-research/swarm/eval_writeupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swarm-ai-research/swarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/swarm-ai-research/swarm/eval_writeup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/swarm-ai-research/swarm/eval_writeup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/swarm-ai-research/swarm/eval_writeup.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02360 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01180 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00472 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00236 |
Grade A, and why
eval_writeup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/eval_writeup
End-to-end pipeline: parse a Prime Intellect eval run, read the environment source, and auto-generate a blog post from eval metrics. Use --parse-only to just extract structured metrics without writing a post. Distinct from /add_post (manually-written original blog post) — use /eval_writeup when starting from eval output, /add_post when writing from scratch.
Consolidates the former /parse_eval command (now /eval_writeup --parse-only).
Usage
/eval_writeup <eval-output-or-job-id> [--title "Custom Title"] [--parse-only]
Examples:
/eval_writeup /path/to/eval_output.txt/eval_writeup swarm_economy_openai_gpt_4.1_mini_20260212_205322_b3c5c09f --title "GPT-4.1 Mini Plays the SWARM Economy"/eval_writeup /path/to/eval_output.txt --parse-only(just parse metrics, no blog post)/eval_writeup swarm_economy_openai_gpt_4.1_mini_20260212_205322_b3c5c09f --parse-only
Argument parsing
Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract:
--parse-only: Only run Phase 1 (parse eval output into structured metrics). Skip environment reading, analysis, and blog post generation.--title "...": Custom blog post title (ignored in--parse-onlymode).- Remaining arg: eval output file path or job ID.
If given a file path, read it directly. If given a job ID, look for the most recent matching output in the tool results cache or ask the user to provide the output.
--parse-only mode
Parse raw prime eval run output into structured metrics tables. This is a read-only analysis — no files are created.
1) Extract header metadata
From the --- Evaluation --- block, extract:
- Environment: name
- Model: provider/model
- Provider: inference endpoint URL
- Examples: count
- Rollouts per example: count
2) Extract reward metrics
From the --- All --- / Rewards: section, parse each metric line:
metric_name: avg - X.XXX, std - X.XXX
Build a summary table:
| Metric | Avg | Std | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reward | 0.830 | 0.092 | 0.690 | 1.028 |
| payoff_reward | 0.701 | 0.101 | 0.540 | 0.916 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 222 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7e2a1f944458
eval_writeup is a command published in the GitHub repository swarm-ai-research/swarm (41 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,360 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
tma1-peer
List recent sessions on this project by agent — peers (Codex, OpenClaw, Copilot CLI) or your own.
skill-inbox
Unified entry point for managing skill suggestions and browsing all installed skills. Provides two views: suggestions (default) and all skills.
eval-merge
Use the Read tool to load .skill-compass/{skill-name}/manifest.json. Verify.
video
Create a design based on video.
good
Write good creative & smart copy [GOOD].
speckit.git.validate
Validate current branch follows feature branch naming conventions.