Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/synaptiai/synapti-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/gh-address)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/gh-address"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/gh-address/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/gh-address"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/gh-address.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01163 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00581 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
gh-address scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Address PR #$ARGUMENTS Comments
Systematically address review feedback on a pull request.
Tool Usage: This workflow uses the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify ambiguous feedback, confirm proposed fixes, and get approval before pushing changes.
Process
-
Fetch PR details and reviews:
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json title,headRefName,state,reviews -
Fetch review comments (inline code comments):
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/$ARGUMENTS/comments -
Fetch PR conversation (general discussion comments):
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/$ARGUMENTS/comments -
Check for resolved/unresolved threads:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/$ARGUMENTS/comments --jq '[.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id == null)] | length' -
Checkout PR branch (if not already on it):
git fetch origin {headRefName} git checkout {headRefName} -
Create checklist of all feedback items to address
-
For each comment:
- Read and understand the feedback
- Read the relevant content context
If feedback is ambiguous, use the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify:
- Quote the unclear comment
- Present your interpretation options:
- Option 1: "I interpret this as [interpretation A]"
- Option 2: "I interpret this as [interpretation B]"
- Option 3: "I need more context to understand"
If you disagree with feedback, use the AskUserQuestion tool:
-
Option 1: "Implement the suggested change anyway"
-
Option 2: "Push back with explanation"
-
Option 3: "Discuss further before deciding"
-
Make the necessary changes
-
Commit with a descriptive message
-
Preview response and get approval using the AskUserQuestion tool:
Before pushing, show the summary of changes and response comment:
- Option 1: "Push changes and post this response" (Recommended)
- Option 2: "Edit response comment first"
- Option 3: "Make additional changes before pushing"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 178 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7e14c1c90910
gh-address is a command published in the GitHub repository synaptiai/synapti-marketplace (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,163 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
cc-review
(Conductor) Review code changes against spec and standards.
create-worktree
Follow these steps to create a git worktree.
production-upgrade
Run the full product upgrade pipeline — 55-agent iterative review with CEO/Engineering/UX/QA parallel loops.
review
Pre-landing code review — analyzes diff for SQL safety, LLM trust boundaries, conditional side effects, missing tests, dependency risks, and security issues.
review
Run code-review and security-review skills against the current diff. Safe to run repeatedly during Build.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.