Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/systemoperators/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/systemoperators/claude-plugins/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/systemoperators/claude-plugins/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/systemoperators/claude-plugins/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/systemoperators/claude-plugins/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/systemoperators/claude-plugins/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00277 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
review a tinydot site
Review all content in a tinydot site and report issues. Follow these steps:
- if no site specified via
$ARGUMENTS, list available sites in~/Library/CloudStorage/Tinydot/and ask which one - read all markdown files in the site folder using Glob for
**/*.md - check each page for:
- missing frontmatter (no
title, nodate, notags) - broken wikilinks:
[[page-name]]where the target page doesn't exist in the site - inconsistent tags: same concept tagged differently (
techvstechnology) - orphan pages: pages with no incoming wikilinks from other pages
- empty or very short pages
- content blocks referencing missing files
- missing frontmatter (no
- report findings grouped by category:
- broken wikilinks
- missing frontmatter
- tag inconsistencies
- orphan pages
- other issues
- for each issue, suggest a specific fix
- offer to fix issues automatically (but ask first)
Use the tinydot-content skill for conventions reference.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A c82ace0ff399
review is a command published in the GitHub repository systemoperators/claude-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 277 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
negative-keyword-sweep
Find wasted spend in Google Ads search terms and add negatives at the right scope (account list, campaign, or ad group). Use when the user says "find junk keywords", "stop wasting on bad searches", or wants a search-terms cleanup.
launch-meta-campaign
Launch a complete Meta Ads campaign — campaign, ad set, and ad(s) — built paused and ready to review. Use when the user wants a new Facebook/Instagram campaign.
duck-off
Turn off Rubber Duck mode and answer normally.
triage
Promote ideas from Ideas.md into Epics or User Stories in the Epic backlog (dedup, typed ID, voice).
ledger-commit
(Ledger) Review and commit the ledger repo's changes (push only on confirmation).
bug
Report a bug instantly to the bug Inbox (append-only, any language, safe mid-work).