Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to T-rav/hydraflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/T-rav/hydraflow/staging/.claude/commands/hf.quality-gate.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T-rav/hydraflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/t-rav/hydraflow/hf.quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/t-rav/hydraflow/hf.quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/t-rav/hydraflow/hf.quality-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/t-rav/hydraflow/hf.quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/t-rav/hydraflow/hf.quality-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
hf.quality-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quality Gate
Run a comprehensive quality check before declaring work complete or committing. This catches lint errors, type issues, and test failures BEFORE they accumulate.
When to Use
- After finishing implementation, before committing
- Anytime you want to verify the codebase is clean
- Before presenting work as "done" to the user
Instructions
Run these checks sequentially (each depends on the prior passing):
Step 1: Lint (auto-fix)
make lint
If ruff fixes anything, report which files were modified. Re-stage those files if they were already staged.
Step 2: Type Check
make typecheck
If pyright reports errors, fix them immediately. Common issues:
- Missing imports after ruff auto-removed unused ones
- Type narrowing needed after refactoring
- New function missing return type annotation
Step 3: Security Scan
make security
Fix any Medium+ findings from bandit.
Step 4: Tests
make test-fast
If tests fail:
- Read the failure output carefully
- Determine if it's a test bug or implementation bug
- Fix the root cause (not the symptom)
- Re-run only the failing test file to verify the fix
- Run the full suite again
Step 5: Report
Produce a summary:
QUALITY GATE: PASS/FAIL
- Lint: ✓/✗ (N files auto-fixed)
- Types: ✓/✗ (N errors)
- Security: ✓/✗ (N findings)
- Tests: ✓/✗ (N passed, N failed)
If any step fails and you cannot auto-fix it, stop and report the issue clearly.
Important
- Do NOT skip steps or declare early success
- Do NOT use
--no-verifyto work around failures - If lint auto-fixes create type errors, fix the type errors too
- This is the minimum bar — run
make qualityfor the full parallel check
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5af56125dc3e
hf.quality-gate is a command published in the GitHub repository T-rav/hydraflow (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 439 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
gh-security-review
Use to perform a dedicated security review of current branch changes before pushing.
gh-release
Create a new release for the marketplace or a specific plugin.
ledger-research
Launch parallel evidence collection across all active research pillars.
gh-status
Quick overview of current GitHub workflow state.
generate-and-verify
Trigger annotation processing in the demo module to generate all outputs (DTOs, MCP tools, REST controllers, OpenAPI spec), then verify the generated code compiles and matches expected patterns. List all generated files with a summary of what each contains.