Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/self-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/self-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/self-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/self-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/self-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00761 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
self-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Self-Test
Run behavioral tests comparing baseline Claude behavior against stay-on-target enhanced behavior.
Process
- Load scenarios from
test/scenarios/*.md - For each scenario:
a. Parse frontmatter for git_ref, cwd, criteria
b. Resolve
${PLUGIN_ROOT}in cwd to actual path c. Compose the stay-on-target prompt (read all prompt modules) d. Dispatch TEST subagent (baseline) - just the user message, no prompt injection e. Dispatch TEST subagent (treatment) - with stay-on-target prompt prepended f. Load rubric and reviewer prompt g. Dispatch REVIEWER subagent to grade baseline response h. Dispatch REVIEWER subagent to grade treatment response i. Record scores - Write results to
test/results/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS.md - Print summary showing baseline vs treatment delta
Composing the Prompt
Read and concatenate:
prompts/_base.mdprompts/behaviors/*.md(in sorted order)
This mirrors what hooks-handlers/session-start.sh does.
Context Isolation
Critical: Test subagents must NOT be aware they are being tested. This prevents meta-awareness where the subagent recognizes it's in a test scenario and behaves differently.
Isolation techniques:
- Use role-play framing ("You are a coding assistant...")
- Provide complete simulated environment (don't reference real context)
- Set working directory to test fixture (
tmp/bktide), not real workspace - Don't mention "test", "scenario", "baseline", "treatment" in prompts
TEST Subagent Prompt (Baseline)
ROLE: You are a coding assistant helping a developer.
ENVIRONMENT:
- Working directory: {cwd}
- This is the start of a new conversation
USER REQUEST:
{user_message}
YOUR TASK:
Respond to the user's request. This is a real development session - help them effectively.
TEST Subagent Prompt (Treatment)
ROLE: You are a coding assistant helping a developer.
ENVIRONMENT:
- Working directory: {cwd}
- This is the start of a new conversation
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS:
{composed_stay_on_target_prompt}
---
USER REQUEST:
{user_message}
YOUR TASK:
Respond to the user's request following the additional instructions above. This is a real development session - help them effectively.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 8f24b22a89a6
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 867672b1b8f4
self-test is a command published in the GitHub repository technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins (12 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 761 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
write-tests
Write tests for: $ARGUMENTS.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first.
apex
APEX Methodology - The systematic Analyze-Plan-Execute-eLicit-eXamine approach for intelligent development. Reduces hallucination and defect risk through mandatory parallel research, self-review, and validation gates.
test-write
Turn a SOLID-verdict ## Test plan critique into real, executing test code via kit:test-writer, one case per matrix row. Never dispatches against a missing, stale, or non-SOLID verdict.
plan-refactor
Plan a refactor as a sequence of safe verified steps, with tests established before anything moves.
prompt-optimization
Improve an underperforming prompt through structured changes measured against fixed cases.