repo-tooling

repo-tooling is a command for Claude Code from TechNickAI/ai-coding-config. It costs 30 tokens per session (3,549 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for setting up common code-quality and automation tools in a repository. These tools check style, format code, run type checks, use Git hooks, and run automated checks in CI.

In plain words
What is it for?
It detects JavaScript, TypeScript, or Python projects and configures tools such as ESLint, Prettier, Ruff, MyPy, Husky, pre-commit, and GitHub Actions when appropriate.
Why use it?
It avoids manually detecting the project language and wiring together basic development checks.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the ai-coding-config plugin — 15 skills, 21 commands, 28 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit It detects JavaScript, TypeScript, or Python projects and configures tools such as ESLint, Prettier, Ruff, MyPy, Husky, pre-commit, and GitHub Actions when appropriate.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechNickAI/ai-coding-config

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ai-coding-config, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 15 skills, 21 commands, 28 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for repo-tooling

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for repo-tooling

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/repo-tooling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,549 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.03549
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.01420
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00710
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00355

Measured 8d ago against content hash 83cab760ab88, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

repo-tooling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/core/commands/repo-tooling.md · 442 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 442 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Repository Tooling Setup

Configures projects with professional development tooling based on detected language:

  • TypeScript/Next.js: ESLint, Prettier, Husky, GitHub Actions
  • Python: Ruff, MyPy, pre-commit, GitHub Actions (templates coming soon)

For language detection:

  • JavaScript/TypeScript: package.json exists
  • TypeScript specifically: tsconfig.json or .ts files present
  • Next.js framework: next.config.js or next.config.mjs exists
  • Python: pyproject.toml, setup.py, or requirements.txt exists
  • Python framework: settings.py (Django), main.py with FastAPI imports, etc.

For existing tooling:

  • Linting: eslint.config.mjs, .eslintrc.*, pyproject.toml with [tool.ruff]
  • Formatting: .prettierrc, prettier.config.*, pyproject.toml with [tool.black]
  • Type checking: tsconfig.json with strict, mypy.ini, pyproject.toml with [tool.mypy]
  • Git hooks: .husky/ directory, .pre-commit-config.yaml
  • CI/CD: .github/workflows/ directory
  • Package manager: Lock files (pnpm-lock.yaml, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, poetry.lock, requirements.txt)

Store findings for recommendation phase.

For TypeScript/JavaScript projects:

  1. Check package.json engines.node field first (respect existing constraints)
  2. If not specified, fetch latest LTS Node version:
  3. Fall back to current installed version: node --version
  4. Store as NODE_VERSION for GitHub Actions workflow

For Python projects (future):

  1. Check pyproject.toml python requirement or .python-version file
  2. If not specified, fetch latest stable Python version from python.org
  3. Fall back to current installed: python --version
  4. Store as PYTHON_VERSION for GitHub Actions

Detect package manager from lock files and configuration:

  • pnpm: pnpm-lock.yaml exists, extract version from packageManager field if available
  • npm: package-lock.json exists
  • yarn: yarn.lock exists
  • poetry: poetry.lock exists
  • pip: requirements.txt exists

Package versions (eslint, prettier, ruff, etc.) use caret ranges in templates - let package manager resolve to latest compatible.

For TypeScript/Next.js projects:

"I can set up professional development tooling for this {framework} project:

{List what will be added based on what's missing:} ✓ ESLint 9 + Prettier 3 for code quality ✓ TypeScript strict mode for enhanced type safety ✓ Pre-commit hooks (Husky + lint-staged) - auto-fix on commit ✓ Pre-push validation (type-check, format, test) ✓ GitHub Actions CI/CD (build, test, quality checks) ✓ Claude Code review on pull requests

Configuration:

  • Node.js {detected-version} ({source: from package.json engines / latest LTS / installed})
  • {detected-package-manager} {version}
  • Latest stable packages: eslint@^9, prettier@^3, husky@^9

{If any tooling already exists:} Already configured: {list existing tools} Will preserve your existing configurations and add missing pieces."

For Python projects:

"Python project detected. Templates for Python tooling setup are coming soon. For now, I recommend manually setting up: ruff for linting, black for formatting, mypy for type checking, and pre-commit for git hooks."

Use AskUserQuestion with single decision point:

  • Header: "Setup"
  • Question: "Proceed with this setup?"
  • Options:
    • "Yes, set it up" - Description: "Use these recommendations and proceed immediately"
    • "Let me customize" - Description: "Choose which features to enable and git strategy"
  • multiSelect: false

Read the full file on GitHub · 442 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 442 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 83cab760ab88

Subscribe to this mod's changes

repo-tooling is a command published in the GitHub repository TechNickAI/ai-coding-config (24 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 3,549 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.