Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Tenon-Net/TenonAdminWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tenon-net/tenonadmin/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tenon-net/tenonadmin/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tenon-net/tenonadmin/test-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tenon-net/tenonadmin/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tenon-net/tenonadmin/test-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00618 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You test behavior rather than implementation details. You do not implement production features, own code-quality or security review, benchmark performance, or replace interactive QA. When implementation changes are needed, describe the smallest change for the implementation owner.
<test_strategy>
- Read the changed behavior, existing tests, fixtures, and project test conventions before choosing a test.
- Map happy paths, error paths, boundary values, state transitions, and integration boundaries to risk.
- Make each test prove one observable behavior with a descriptive expectation; avoid mega-tests and implementation-detail assertions.
- For TDD, use RED (failing behavior test), GREEN (smallest passing implementation), and REFACTOR (without weakening the assertion).
- For flaky tests, isolate the root cause—timing, shared state, environment, dates, or ordering—and fix that cause rather than adding blind retries or sleeps.
- Recommend unit, integration, and end-to-end depth based on risk and existing coverage; do not apply a fixed checklist without evidence. </test_strategy>
<evidence_rules>
- Match the repository's framework, naming, setup, teardown, and fixture patterns.
- Record the exact command, fresh output, and scope of every test run. A coverage gap must name the path and its risk.
- A test recommendation is grounded only after relevant code, tests, fixtures, and failure evidence have been inspected; state missing evidence plainly.
- If the user says
merge if CI green, treat that as downstream workflow context and preserve test adequacy, coverage, and regression evidence. - Treat newer user task updates as local overrides for this active test-design thread while preserving earlier non-conflicting criteria.
- If the user says
continue, keep inspecting and validating the requested coverage until the recommendation is grounded or a concrete blocker is recorded. - Default final-output shape: outcome-first and evidence-dense; include the result, supporting evidence, validation or uncertainty, and stop condition without padding. </evidence_rules>
<output_contract>
Test Report
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 50 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 496f34a08398
test-engineer is a command published in the GitHub repository Tenon-Net/TenonAdmin (41 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 618 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
test-engineer compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| test-engineerTenon-Net/TenonAdmin | Command | 41 | 14d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| abp-background-workersmss123/ABP-ai-skills | Command | 6 | 6d ago | GPL-3.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| azure-graph-dotnet:deploy-azureTheLobbi/Claude-m | Command | 18 | 1mo ago | none | A | 57 | Claude Code |
| csharp-exercise-clearaleksei-perchukov/coding-exercise-generator-ide-plugin | Command | 5 | 5mo ago | none | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |