Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tensorbee/rdocx. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tensorbee/rdocx/main/.claude/commands/release.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tensorbee/rdocxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tensorbee/rdocx/release)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tensorbee/rdocx/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tensorbee/rdocx/release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tensorbee/rdocx/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tensorbee/rdocx/release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02058 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00823 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00412 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00206 |
Grade A, and why
release scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/release {vX.Y.Z | rpptx-vX.Y.Z}
Release one complete Rust, CLI and Python family from the exact main merge
commit produced by /close-sprint. This command alone may create or push a
release tag or start crates.io and PyPI publication. It never edits versions,
merges branches, or creates a sprint tag. Historical py-* tags remain
immutable and readable, but cannot start a new publication.
Family contract
For vX.Y.Z, the selected crates.io set is exactly rdocx-opc,
rdocx-oxml, rdocx-layout, rdocx-html, rdocx-pdf, rdocx, and
rdocx-cli. The selected Python project is rdocx from rdocx-py.
For rpptx-vX.Y.Z, the selected crates.io set is exactly oxml-core,
oxml-opc, oxml-media, oxml-layout, oxml-drawing, oxml-pdf,
oxml-sml, oxml-cli-support, oxml-chart, rpptx-oxml, rpptx-chart,
rpptx-layout, rpptx-render, rpptx, and rpptx-cli. The selected
Python project is rpptx from rpptx-py. The exact selected Rust manifests,
workspace dependency pins when present, binding crate and pyproject.toml
version must match X.Y.Z. Binding and WASM crates are not published to
crates.io. Each release contains six selected CLI archives, six cp39-abi3
wheels, one source distribution and one SHA256SUMS covering all thirteen
payloads.
Preconditions
Refuse before any tag or push if one check fails:
- The argument is exactly
vX.Y.Zorrpptx-vX.Y.Z, with no suffix or extra prefix. Runpython3 scripts/sprint_workflow.py unified-release-family <requested-tag>and inspect all selected version carriers and exact package allowlists. - The current branch is clean
main, at the same SHA asorigin/main. The sprint that prepared this release has already closed through/close-sprint, and itssNNtag points to this exact merge commit. The selected release preparation F-ID isdonein the sprint delivery records and its plan is completed. All its dependencies are done. - The committed sprint review is clean at the reviewed sprint SHA and the
/close-sprintreport records the merge. Compare the merge commit tree with that reviewed sprint tree. Only the reviewed close-sprint tracker summary may differ. Refuse a material source, release-workflow, command, changelog, manifest, lockfile, or HLD difference. Do not run/sprint-reviewonmain, because that command writes tracked review files. - Consume the closed sprint's authenticated full verification at producer H
and its validated completion/review metadata at R when this clean main
merge M has exactly R's Git tree and all relevant tools, oracle inputs,
configuration and retained artifacts remain unchanged. Use the existing
closure_evidence_problems(load(sprint), reviewed_R)check and step3's actual main/review tree comparison. Current clean main, origin/main and sprint tag identities remain required. Record H, R and M truthfully. Do not claim the commands ran at M or repeat them merely because merging changed the commit SHA. No new cache service or command bridge is needed. A latest failed full attempt blocks reuse of an older green one. Missing evidence, a material tree delta or changed inputs requires the missing or invalidated gates. Both requested families reuse this common applicable full evidence. Fresh registry, publisher and approval checks remain due. - Run
python3 scripts/sprint_workflow.py release-notes <requested-tag> --check, render the exactCHANGELOG.mdbody, and inspect the family-only claims, compatibility guidance, included issue and pull-request links, and authenticated contributor credit. Rebuild the selected contribution inventory from reviewed evidence. - Consume the actual locally patched publication dry run included in step4's applicable full evidence, with its retained verified archives and exact 22-package union below10MiB. Do not execute it a second time. Confirm the selected family's crates.io versions and PyPI version are freshly absent. A duplicate or partial prior publication is a failed release.
- Inspect
.github/workflows/wheels.yml. Its tag path must select exactly one Rust allowlist, one CLI binary, and one Python distribution, validate six CLI archives and seven Python artifacts, verify their provenance, publish through thepypienvironment and create one GitHub release only after both registries succeed. The PyPI trusted publisher for the selected project must identify this repository,wheels.yml, and environmentpypi, with no long-lived token. - Fetch the remote tag namespaces. The requested tag must be absent locally
and on
origin. Confirm the selected crates.io and PyPI owner or maintainer roles that will be checked after publication.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +10 lines 112e51097c84
- 26d ago First seen · 140 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 707c382ee471
release is a command published in the GitHub repository tensorbee/rdocx (44 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,058 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
sync-coordinator
Multi-package synchronization and version alignment with ruv-swarm coordination for seamless integration between claude-code-flow and ruv-swarm packages.
land
Resolve and squash merge one named, currently authorized pull request.
sync-coordinator
Multi-package synchronization and version alignment with ruv-swarm coordination for seamless integration between claude-code-flow and ruv-swarm packages.
lavra-ship
Fully automated ship sequence from code-ready to PR-open with beads closed and knowledge captured.
github-modes
This document describes all GitHub integration modes available in Claude-Flow with ruv-swarm coordination. Each mode is optimized for specific GitHub workflows and includes batch tool integration for maximum efficiency.
gsd:ship
Create PR, run review, and prepare for merge after verification passes.