Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-pyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-py/conformance-walk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-py/conformance-walk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-py/conformance-walk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-py/conformance-walk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-py/conformance-walk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01295 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
conformance-walk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/conformance-walk — Run The Conformance Walk, Adapter Family Auto-Selected
Run a Conformance Walk (CW) over the repo's testable surfaces: enumerate every
actionable unit → attach a FROZEN expectation → judge live/static state with a
DETERMINISTIC oracle → report coverage HONESTLY (separate from pass-rate) → RATCHET so a
new unit without an expectation fails. CW = one cw_core + three oracle families on
one delivery axis — Source (SCM) → Delivered (DCM/FCM) → Live (API/CLI/MCP/FE=TOW).
You never choose a tool. This command DETECTS the project flavor at invocation and
APPLIES the matching adapter family. The methodology is rules/conformance-walk.md (the
four MUST clauses) + skills/conformance-walk/SKILL.md (the model); the per-flavor
runbook this command drives is skills/conformance-walk/command-runbook.md.
1. Detect the project flavor (auto — never asked)
Read the repo's manifest files (Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml / setup.py,
package.json, Gemfile) and look for kailash markers (a kailash* crate/package
dependency, or a shipped conformance-walk/ engine directory). Delegate to
stack-detector when the host language is ambiguous. Resolve to exactly one flavor:
- kailash-rs — Rust host + kailash markers.
- kailash-py — Python host + kailash markers.
- other kailash-* — kailash markers, a different host language.
- non-kailash — no kailash markers.
Full detection algorithm (signal precedence, tie-breaks, the fail-safe default):
skills/conformance-walk/command-runbook.md § Flavor Detection.
2. Select the adapter family (from the detected flavor)
- kailash-* (rs / py / other) → the kailash reference adapter FAMILY. Run the CW
methodology (the frozen-expectation walk) PLUS the language-specific engine that ships
with the kailash SDK:
cw_core+ the Source, Delivered, and Live adapters. Per flavor: kailash-rs scanscrates/**(Source via rustdoc-JSON) + the resolved shipped-feature wheel surface (Delivered) + service-boot (Live); kailash-py scans the package /__all__/ AST surface (Source) + the shipped wheel × binding surface (Delivered) + Live. Where a language lacks a shipped adapter, that surface degrades to core-only rather than failing. - non-kailash → ARTIFACT-ONLY / core-only. Run the CW methodology +
cw_core+ the consumer's OWN per-surface adapters (each repo authors adapters for the surfaces it exposes, perskills/conformance-walk/SKILL.md§ Per-consumer adapter obligation). Surfaces with no applicable adapter degrade gracefully — reported, never faked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 92 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A bfdf3c498f4d
conformance-walk is a command published in the GitHub repository terrene-foundation/kailash-coc-claude-py (12 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,295 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.