Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TestAny-io/testany-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00442 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00177 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Testany Execution
管理已经发起的 Testany execution：查看进度、查询历史、刷新状态、取消未开始执行，并在失败时交给 debug。
使用方式
$ARGUMENTS
按 整体目标交接 复用真实 execution key 与已有等待期限；只查询不自动等待，终态失败不扩大为重新执行。
核心动作
- 查看进度：查看单次 execution 当前状态和 case 结果
- 查询历史：按 workspace / pipeline / status 检索执行记录
- 刷新状态：主动刷新 execution 状态
- 取消执行：取消尚未开始的 execution
- 失败交接：将失败 execution 转给
testany-debug
重要边界
- 本命令不负责发起新的执行
- 如果你要“现在立刻执行一次”，请先用
/trigger - 本命令只处理 execution 发起之后的观测与管理
- 只查当前状态就查询后交付，不自动长轮询或 refresh；等待、取消和重试分别核对当前授权
- 明确等待时遵守 有界等待合同，默认 10 分钟，用户更短预算优先；到期保留最后状态，不宣称远程已取消/失败
示例
/execution 查看 Y2K-0601-0000B
/execution 看 Y2K-0601 最近的失败执行
/execution 刷新 Y2K-0601-0000B
/execution 取消 Y2K-0601-0000B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 673a98994255
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A d119807e49c0
execution is a command published in the GitHub repository TestAny-io/testany-agent-skills (82 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 442 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
csharp-exercise-check
A command that checks a solution and returns only “Correct” or “Incorrect.”
js-exercise-check
A command that checks a JavaScript exercise solution and returns only “Correct” or “Incorrect.”
kotlin-exercise-check
A Kotlin exercise checker that reports whether a solution is correct or incorrect.
python-exercise-check
A command that checks a submitted Python exercise and reports only whether it is correct or incorrect.
swift-exercise-check
A command that checks a Swift exercise solution and reports only whether it is correct or incorrect.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.