Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TestAny-io/testany-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/prototype-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/prototype-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/prototype-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/prototype-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/testany-io/testany-agent-skills/prototype-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00719 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
prototype-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Prototype Reviewer
执行前读取 工作流执行约定：先取证再提问、按实际工具能力回退，并从本次安装位置定位资源。
启动原型审查流程。作为 prototype 进入 API Contract / HLD 阶段前的独立门禁，审查视觉品质、真实交互、工程隔离安全性和下游输入质量。执行细则见 prototype-reviewer。 评审先读取 证据、准出与复审规则。P2 不按数量阻断；缺证据不等于产品缺陷；提前门禁失败不取消独立安全检查；完成本轮评审不等于批准工件。
使用方式
提供原型沙箱目录路径（正式模式建议同时提供 PRD 和 User Journey 路径；由口述需求生成的原型以 Manifest 中的需求推断卡为基线）：
$ARGUMENTS
原型审查在研发流程中的位置
PRD → UC Journey → Prototype Designer → [Prototype Reviewer] → API Contract → HLD
四道门审查框架
第一道门：上游对齐（P0 阻塞）
- PRD 需求（REQ-*）是否完整映射到页面
- Journey 步骤是否完整映射到页面
- PRD / Journey 齐备性
第二道门：原型体验与完整性
- P0 Journey Happy Path 可达性
- 状态矩阵覆盖（正常/加载/空/错误/边界）
- 跨页面导航完整性
- P1/P2 预算裁剪合规
- Visual Brief、排版/配色/布局/密度及约定视口的真实视觉表现
- 当前实现的截图观察、实际操作与修正复验记录
第三道门：工程隔离（核心安全检查）
- 沙箱目录完整性
- 沙箱外零未授权变更
- 路由前缀隔离
- 零依赖新增
- 零生产文件改动
第四道门：下游可用性
- API Contract 输入质量（数据需求、字段、结构）
- HLD 输入质量（状态管理、缓存、性能）
准出门槛
- P0 = 0（任一 P0 即阻断）
- P1 = 0（任一 P1 即不通过）
- P2 不按数量阻断
- 必要视觉/行为证据充分；缺失记 evidence_gap，待补证据、未准出，不自动定产品 P1
- 专项检查保持用户范围，不因新增视觉标准要求补做全部门禁
必需产出
- 审查报告（含问题清单和证据）
- 准出证书（通过时）
请提供沙箱目录路径开始审查。建议同时提供 PRD 和 User Journey 路径。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed fc40688344e6
- 26d ago Changed · +4 lines f1fdf700643e
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines ca9ad719fa04
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 6338b8b5b751
prototype-reviewer is a command published in the GitHub repository TestAny-io/testany-agent-skills (82 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 719 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
profile
Save, load, inspect, update, reset, or delete diagram-design client profiles.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
design-audit
Audit the rendered design of live sites. Evidence capture first, then one critique per site. Argument is a URL, a repo name, or all.
4-generate
Run Stage 4 of the design system skill generation pipeline: parallel skill file generation.
mockups-generate
Generate dashboard mockups.
discover-diagrams
Load diagram skills (Mermaid flowcharts, sequence, ER, architecture).