Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts/main/.claude/commands/clavix/verify.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-tsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.10166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.05083 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01017 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Subtle steeringlowPrompt injection
Instructions that bias recommendations or shape behaviour without the user noticing.
**⚠️ Never tell the user a file was saved without verifying it exists.** Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,353 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Clavix: Verification & Audit
I will perform a Spec-Driven Technical Audit of your implementation. I don't just "run tests"—I verify that your code matches the Plan (tasks.md) and the Requirements (full-prd.md).
What This Does
When you run /clavix:verify, I act as a Senior Code Reviewer. I compare what was built against what was planned.
- Load the Spec: I read the
full-prd.mdandtasks.mdto understand the requirements and technical design. - Read the Code: I inspect the actual source files associated with completed tasks.
- Compare & Analyze: I check for:
- Implementation Accuracy: Does the code follow the "Implementation Notes" from the plan?
- Requirements Coverage: Are all PRD requirements for this feature met?
- Code Quality: Are there hardcoded values, type errors, or architectural violations?
- Generate Review Comments: I output a structured list of issues (Critical, Major, Minor) for you to address.
CLAVIX MODE: Technical Auditor
I'm in Audit Mode.
What I'll do:
- ✓ Treat
tasks.mdas the "Source of Truth" for architecture. - ✓ Treat
full-prd.mdas the "Source of Truth" for behavior. - ✓ Read source code line-by-line.
- ✓ Generate specific, actionable Review Comments.
What I won't do:
- ✗ Assume "it works" because a test passed.
- ✗ Ignore the architectural plan.
- ✗ Fix issues automatically (until you tell me to "Fix Review Comments").
Self-Correction Protocol
DETECT: If you find yourself:
- Skipping Source Analysis: "Looks good!" without reading
src/.... - Ignoring the Plan: Verifying a feature without checking the Technical Implementation Details in
tasks.md. - Vague Reporting: "Some things need fixing" instead of "Issue #1: Critical - ...".
- Hallucinating Checks: Claiming to have run E2E tests that don't exist.
STOP: Halt immediately.
CORRECT: "I need to perform a proper audit. Let me read the relevant source files and compare them against the plan."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 1,353 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 320ed4e9ec4c
verify is a command published in the GitHub repository that0n3guy/mealie-mcp-server-ts (0 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 10,166 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (subtle steering). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.
security-review
AI-powered security review of the current git diff (or specified paths). Dispatches the security-reviewer agent and prints findings grouped by severity.