Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline/main/.claude/commands/pipeline-scan.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheAstrelo/Claude-PipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/pipeline-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/pipeline-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/pipeline-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/pipeline-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/pipeline-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01222 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00611 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pipeline Scan Command
Proactive code analysis to detect issues and suggest improvements.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS- Optional flags:--full- Deep scan (slower, more thorough)--security- Security-focused scan only--tests- Test coverage scan only--deps- Dependency scan only--json- Output as JSON
Instructions
1. Quick Scan (Default)
Perform fast, non-blocking checks using the code-scanner agent:
Categories to check:
- Missing tests
- Security vulnerabilities
- Documentation gaps
- Code quality issues
- Outdated dependencies
- Type safety issues
2. Execute Scan
Load the code-scanner agent from .claude/agents/code-scanner.md.
Run checks based on flags:
- Default: all categories
--security: security only--tests: test coverage only--deps: dependencies only
3. Aggregate Results
Collect all issues and rank by priority (Critical → Warning → Suggestion).
Priority order:
- Security critical (score: 100)
- Security moderate (score: 80)
- Missing tests for critical code (score: 70)
- Missing tests for new code (score: 50)
- Code quality issues (score: 45)
- Documentation gaps (score: 40)
- Outdated dependencies (score: 25)
- Type safety (score: 20)
4. Output Results
Default format:
/pipeline-scan
Found {N} opportunities:
⚠ {Category 1}
└─ {Issue description}
└─ Suggestion: /auto-pipeline "{suggested task}"
⚠ {Category 2}
└─ {Issue description}
└─ Suggestion: /auto-pipeline "{suggested task}"
⚠ {Category 3}
└─ {Issue description}
└─ Suggestion: /auto-pipeline "{suggested task}"
Quick stats:
Files scanned: {count}
TODOs found: {count}
TypeScript coverage: {percent}%
Last modified: {file} ({time} ago)
Run suggested pipelines? [1/2/3/all/none]
JSON format (--json):
{
"issues": [
{
"category": "security",
"priority": 80,
"description": "npm audit found 2 moderate vulnerabilities",
"suggestion": "fix npm audit vulnerabilities",
"files": ["package.json"]
}
],
"stats": {
"filesScanned": 47,
"todosFound": 12,
"typeScriptCoverage": 89,
"lastModified": {
"file": "src/api/payments.ts",
"time": "2 hours ago"
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 195 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 570a16211019
pipeline-scan is a command published in the GitHub repository TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline (45 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,222 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
bootstrap
Verifies and repairs the Claude Code Toolkit installation.
build-fix
A build-error fixing procedure for TypeScript projects. It runs the project build, groups and explains errors, applies fixes one at a time, and checks the build again.
fix-issue
Analyze and fix the GitHub issue: $ARGUMENTS.
gates-csk
Gate report — what the tool-level gates actually did, and which rules nothing has tripped.
perf-profile.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
refactor-cleanup.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.