Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline/main/.claude/commands/security-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheAstrelo/Claude-PipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/theastrelo/claude-pipeline/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security audit - check for OWASP vulnerabilities, auth bypass, and secrets exposure.
Purpose
Audit code changes for security vulnerabilities:
- Injection attacks (SQL, XSS, command)
- Authentication bypass
- Access control issues
- Secrets exposure
- Security misconfiguration
Execution
Use the security-auditor agent.
Input: Read build-report.md to identify changed files.
Process:
-
Scan for injection patterns:
- SQL injection: string interpolation in queries
- XSS: dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage
- Command injection: exec/spawn with user input
-
Audit authentication:
- All API routes have requireAuth/requireAdmin
- User ID from req.userId, not req.body
-
Verify access control:
- Multi-tenant filtering (user_id in queries)
- No IDOR vulnerabilities
-
Check for secrets:
- No hardcoded API keys/passwords
- No credentials in error messages
-
Append results to
qa-report.md
Vulnerability Patterns
| Pattern | Risk | Detection |
|---|---|---|
${userId} in SQL |
SQL Injection | HIGH |
dangerouslySetInnerHTML |
XSS | MEDIUM |
exec(userInput) |
Command Injection | CRITICAL |
Missing requireAuth |
Auth Bypass | HIGH |
Missing user_id filter |
Data Leak | HIGH |
| Hardcoded secrets | Secret Exposure | CRITICAL |
Output
After audit, report:
## Security Audit Complete
**Verdict:** [PASS | FAIL | CRITICAL]
### Vulnerability Scan
- SQL Injection: [CLEAR | FOUND]
- XSS: [CLEAR | FOUND]
- Command Injection: [CLEAR | FOUND]
### Authentication
- Routes checked: [N]
- Protected: [N]
- Unprotected: [List]
### Access Control
- Multi-tenant filters: [OK | MISSING]
- IDOR risks: [NONE | FOUND]
### Secrets
- Hardcoded secrets: [NONE | FOUND]
### Required Fixes
[If FAIL/CRITICAL, specific fixes with code examples]
### Summary
This concludes the QA pipeline.
Verdict Levels
- PASS: No vulnerabilities found
- FAIL: Vulnerabilities found, must fix
- CRITICAL: Severe vulnerabilities, stop immediately
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 107 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 245458aef6c2
security-review is a command published in the GitHub repository TheAstrelo/Claude-Pipeline (45 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 552 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
status
Summarise what Fabrik is doing right now — board state, in-flight workers, worktrees with uncommitted changes.
setup-forge
First-run onboarding — asks name/goal/project-type/language, then beginner-safe API-key setup, then scaffolds the per-project Forge system. User-invoked only. Run once per project. Subcommands: doctor · keys · reset.
spreadsheet-audit
Perform a 6-step audit of an Excel spreadsheet for formula correctness, formatting consistency, data integrity, boss-auditable simplicity, and spec compliance. Uses the excel-screenshot MCP server tools — no Excel installation required.
custom-brief
Deep-research a specific topic and produce a comprehensive news-focused briefing with optional Notion/Obsidian/Teams/Slack publishing.
diagnose-roast-curve
Diagnose a logged roast curve for the classic defects — crash, flick, stall/bake, tipping, scorching — and assess RoR smoothness and development-time ratio.
gsd:resume-work
Resume work from previous session with full context restoration.