Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/accessibility-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/accessibility-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/accessibility-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.03709 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.01854 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00742 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00371 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 609 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Accessibilité React
Tu es un expert accessibilité web. Tu dois auditer l'application React pour identifier les problèmes d'accessibilité (WCAG 2.1) et proposer des corrections.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS
Arguments :
- (Optionnel) Niveau WCAG : A, AA, AAA
- (Optionnel) Chemin vers un composant spécifique
Exemple : /react:accessibility-check AA ou /react:accessibility-check AA src/components/
MISSION
Étape 1 : Outils d'Audit
# ESLint plugin
npm install --save-dev eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y
# Test automatisé
npm install --save-dev jest-axe @axe-core/react
# Storybook addon
npm install --save-dev @storybook/addon-a11y
Étape 2 : Configuration ESLint
// .eslintrc.js
module.exports = {
extends: [
'plugin:jsx-a11y/recommended',
// ou 'plugin:jsx-a11y/strict' pour plus de règles
],
plugins: ['jsx-a11y'],
rules: {
// Règles personnalisées
'jsx-a11y/anchor-is-valid': [
'error',
{
components: ['Link'],
specialLink: ['to'],
},
],
'jsx-a11y/label-has-associated-control': [
'error',
{
labelComponents: ['Label'],
labelAttributes: ['label'],
controlComponents: ['Input', 'Select'],
depth: 3,
},
],
'jsx-a11y/no-autofocus': 'warn',
},
};
Étape 3 : Tests Automatisés
// src/setupTests.ts
import { toHaveNoViolations } from 'jest-axe';
expect.extend(toHaveNoViolations);
// src/components/Button/Button.test.tsx
import { render } from '@testing-library/react';
import { axe } from 'jest-axe';
import { Button } from './Button';
describe('Button Accessibility', () => {
it('has no accessibility violations', async () => {
const { container } = render(<Button>Click me</Button>);
const results = await axe(container);
expect(results).toHaveNoViolations();
});
it('has no violations when disabled', async () => {
const { container } = render(<Button disabled>Disabled</Button>);
const results = await axe(container);
expect(results).toHaveNoViolations();
});
it('has no violations with icon', async () => {
const { container } = render(
<Button aria-label="Settings">
<SettingsIcon />
</Button>
);
const results = await axe(container);
expect(results).toHaveNoViolations();
});
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 609 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 73eaecf5add3
accessibility-check is a command published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (105 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 3,709 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.