Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/check-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/check-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/check-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/check-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/check-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.01178 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00589 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
check-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Angular Standards Compliance Check
Verify that the Angular project follows established coding standards and best practices.
What This Command Does
-
Standards Verification
- Check coding conventions
- Verify naming conventions
- Validate file organization
- Check import order
- Verify documentation standards
-
Angular-Specific Checks
- Standalone components usage
- Signals implementation
- OnPush change detection
- Modern control flow (@if, @for)
- Typed forms
-
Generated Report
- Non-compliant files
- Severity levels
- Remediation recommendations
- Compliance score (/100)
Compliance Areas
1. Component Standards
// ✅ Compliant
@Component({
selector: 'app-user-profile',
standalone: true,
imports: [CommonModule],
changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush,
template: `...`
})
export class UserProfileComponent {}
// ❌ Non-compliant
@Component({
selector: 'user-profile', // Missing app- prefix
// standalone: missing // Not standalone
// changeDetection: missing // Not OnPush
})
export class UserProfile {} // Missing Component suffix
2. Signal Usage
// ✅ Compliant - Using signals
export class CounterComponent {
count = signal(0);
doubleCount = computed(() => this.count() * 2);
}
// ❌ Non-compliant - Using observables for local state
export class CounterComponent {
count$ = new BehaviorSubject(0);
}
3. Template Syntax
<!-- ✅ Compliant - Modern control flow -->
@if (loading()) {
<app-spinner />
}
@for (item of items(); track item.id) {
<app-item [data]="item" />
}
<!-- ❌ Non-compliant - Legacy syntax -->
<app-spinner *ngIf="loading"></app-spinner>
<app-item *ngFor="let item of items" [data]="item"></app-item>
4. Dependency Injection
// ✅ Compliant - inject() function
export class MyComponent {
private readonly userService = inject(UserService);
}
// ⚠️ Warning - Constructor injection (valid but verbose)
export class MyComponent {
constructor(private userService: UserService) {}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 202 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 8927c839418c
check-compliance is a command published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (105 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 1,178 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
perf-audit
Performance audit for web applications.
scaffold
Scaffold project components from templates.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.