Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skill. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skill/main/.claude/commands/ux-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skill/ux-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skill/ux-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skill/ux-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00655 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00328 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
ux-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +15 lines · +17 tokens per session b7c991d24ec8
- 7d ago First seen · 58 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3f48e01c4eb1
ux-review is a command published in the GitHub repository thecoderbuddy/agile-team-skill (9 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 655 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
accessibility-audit
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct comprehensive audits, identify barriers, provide remediation guidance, and ensure digital products are accessible to all users.
qa-design
UI/UX design audit and verification of web best practices.
dev-design-system
Creation and maintenance of design systems and component libraries.
design
Route a design GitHub issue through the UI Taste Harness — investigate → architect → implement → critique loop → user-feedback loop → close — accumulating FORGE:DESIGN annotations and driving the design: label state machine to design:shipped.
design-bench
Run the ABC benchmark — reference URL → design-blind brief → render arms A/B/C → blind judge → scorecard with win-rates over n runs.
design-render-critique-loop
Render a design from its FORGE:DESIGNSPEC, critique the rendered pixels against the perceptual negatives, and iterate until it passes or the budget is spent — the missing reward signal.