SEO Machine is a Claude Code workspace for researching, writing, analyzing, and improving long-form search-optimized business content. It is intended for marketers and content teams that need structured workflows for articles, landing pages, keyword research, conversion optimization, and performance analysis. Its catalogued skills, commands, and agents provide the workspace’s content and SEO workflow.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TheCraigHewitt/seomachine. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheCraigHewitt/seomachine/main/.claude/commands/landing-audit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheCraigHewitt/seomachineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thecraighewitt/seomachine/landing-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thecraighewitt/seomachine/landing-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thecraighewitt/seomachine/landing-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thecraighewitt/seomachine/landing-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thecraighewitt/seomachine/landing-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01931 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00966 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00386 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
landing-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- landing-audit — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 306 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Landing Page Audit Command
Use this command to audit existing landing pages for conversion optimization opportunities.
Usage
/landing-audit [URL or file path] --goal [trial|demo|lead]
Examples:
/landing-audit https://yoursite.com/private-producting-solutions//landing-audit landing-pages/product-hosting-beginners-2025-12-11.md --goal trial/landing-audit https://yoursite.com/pricing/ --goal trial
Defaults:
--goal trial(if not specified)
What This Command Does
- Fetches or reads the landing page content
- Runs comprehensive CRO analysis using multiple analyzers
- Pulls GA4 performance data (if available for [YOUR COMPANY] pages)
- Generates prioritized recommendations
- Saves audit report for reference
Analysis Modules Used
1. Landing Page Scorer
Module: data_sources/modules/landing_page_scorer.py
- Overall score (0-100) against CRO best practices
- Category scores: Above-fold, CTAs, Trust signals, Structure, SEO
- Critical issues and warnings
- Publishing readiness assessment
2. Above-the-Fold Analyzer
Module: data_sources/modules/above_fold_analyzer.py
- Headline quality assessment
- Value proposition clarity
- CTA visibility check
- Trust signal presence
- 5-second test evaluation
3. CTA Analyzer
Module: data_sources/modules/cta_analyzer.py
- CTA count and distribution
- Individual CTA quality scoring
- Goal alignment check
- Placement recommendations
4. Trust Signal Analyzer
Module: data_sources/modules/trust_signal_analyzer.py
- Testimonial analysis (count, quality, specificity)
- Social proof detection
- Risk reversal presence
- Authority signals
5. CRO Checker
Module: data_sources/modules/cro_checker.py
- Checklist-based audit (30+ checks)
- Pass/fail for each CRO best practice
- Critical failures identification
- Category-by-category breakdown
Process
Step 1: Content Retrieval
For URLs:
- Fetch page content using WebFetch tool
- Extract main content from HTML
- Convert to markdown for analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 306 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 90b0ade20730
landing-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository TheCraigHewitt/seomachine (7,427 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,931 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.