Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/theoden8/webspace_app/opsx-newgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theoden8/webspace_appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/theoden8/webspace_app/opsx-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/theoden8/webspace_app/opsx-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/theoden8/webspace_app/opsx-new.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00596 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
opsx-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Start a new change using the experimental artifact-driven approach.
Input: The argument after /opsx:new is the change name (kebab-case), OR a description of what the user wants to build.
Steps
-
If no input provided, ask what they want to build
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Determine the workflow schema
Use the default schema (omit
--schema) unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.Use a different schema only if the user mentions:
- A specific schema name → use
--schema <name> - "show workflows" or "what workflows" → run
openspec schemas --jsonand let them choose
Otherwise: Omit
--schemato use the default. - A specific schema name → use
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"Add
--schema <name>only if the user requested a specific workflow. This creates a scaffolded change atopenspec/changes/<name>/with the selected schema. -
Show the artifact status
openspec status --change "<name>"This shows which artifacts need to be created and which are ready (dependencies satisfied).
-
Get instructions for the first artifact The first artifact depends on the schema. Check the status output to find the first artifact with status "ready".
openspec instructions <first-artifact-id> --change "<name>"This outputs the template and context for creating the first artifact.
-
STOP and wait for user direction
Output
After completing the steps, summarize:
- Change name and location
- Schema/workflow being used and its artifact sequence
- Current status (0/N artifacts complete)
- The template for the first artifact
- Prompt: "Ready to create the first artifact? Run
/opsx:continueor just describe what this change is about and I'll draft it."
Guardrails
- Do NOT create any artifacts yet - just show the instructions
- Do NOT advance beyond showing the first artifact template
- If the name is invalid (not kebab-case), ask for a valid name
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest using
/opsx:continueinstead - Pass --schema if using a non-default workflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 68 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A c075df2589cb
opsx-new is a command published in the GitHub repository theoden8/webspace_app (201 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 596 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
feature
Post a feature to the Features Board on production and write tweets.
commit-all
Group all changes semantically and commit each group separately.
release
릴리즈 절차 — 버전 추천부터 릴리즈 PR까지 (changesets, 가이드형).
compound
현재 작업에서 재사용 패턴을 추출해 AGENTS.md·문서를 업데이트한다. 같은 종류의 버그·구현을 2회 이상 해결했거나 작업 종료 시 재사용 가치가 보일 때 사용. 일회성 작업에는 쓰지 않는다.
qa
QA 전문가 — 테스트 기획 및 작성. 새 기능에 테스트가 필요하거나 기존 테스트의 신뢰성(Potemkin·Flaky)이 의심될 때 사용. 실제 기능·성능 검증 중심.
audit
Scan a codebase for existing observability instrumentation and identify gaps.