Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thepushkarp/brainstorm-planWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thepushkarp/brainstorm-plan/brainstorm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thepushkarp/brainstorm-plan/brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thepushkarp/brainstorm-plan/brainstorm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thepushkarp/brainstorm-plan/brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thepushkarp/brainstorm-plan/brainstorm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00892 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00357 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brainstorm: Idea to Design Doc
Help the user turn a fuzzy idea into a fully formed design and specification through structured conversation.
Initial Argument
$ARGUMENTS
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Context
First, explore the current project state to understand where we're starting:
-
Check if this is an existing project or a new one:
- Look for common project indicators:
package.json,pyproject.toml,Cargo.toml,go.mod,README.md,src/, etc. - If existing project: Use Glob and Read to understand the codebase structure, key files, and existing patterns
- If new/empty project: Acknowledge this and note we're starting fresh
- Look for common project indicators:
-
Briefly summarize what you found (2-3 sentences max) before proceeding to questions.
Step 2: Capture the Initial Idea
If the user provided an argument, use that as the starting idea. Otherwise, ask: "What's the idea you'd like to explore?"
Step 3: Guided Q&A (ONE question at a time)
Ask clarifying questions to refine the idea into a concrete spec:
Rules:
- Ask only ONE question per message
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible (use AskUserQuestion tool)
- Open-ended questions are OK when choices aren't clear
- Keep questions focused and specific
- Build on previous answers
- Stop when you have enough clarity to write the design
Question areas to cover:
- Core problem being solved
- Target users/use cases
- Key features and behaviors
- Technical constraints or preferences
- Integration with existing code (if applicable)
- Non-goals (what this explicitly won't do)
- Edge cases and error handling
Step 4: Present the Design (in sections)
Once you understand the requirements, describe the design:
Rules:
- Present in sections of 200-300 words each
- After each section, ask: "Does this section look right so far?"
- Wait for confirmation before continuing to the next section
- Revise sections based on feedback before moving on
Suggested design doc structure:
- Overview - What this is and why it matters (1 paragraph)
- Goals - What we're trying to achieve (bullet points)
- Non-Goals - What we're explicitly NOT doing (bullet points)
- User Experience - How users will interact with this
- Technical Approach - High-level architecture and key decisions
- Key Components - Main pieces and how they fit together
- Open Questions - Things still to be decided
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A f2189bcb76a8
brainstorm is a command published in the GitHub repository thepushkarp/brainstorm-plan (11 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 892 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
psql-query
Run ad-hoc PostgreSQL analytics queries against dev/test database.
techdebt
Find and report technical debt in the codebase.
fix-issue
Command "fix-issue" from KhaiTrang1995/claude-code-structure, covering /project:fix-issue – fix issue command, usage, description, shell steps and run tests after fix.
review
Command "review" from KhaiTrang1995/claude-code-structure, covering /project:review – code review command, usage, description, output format and shell step.
odoo-review
Review a GitHub PR against Odoo PSDU conventions — business need, file-by-file, then full-logic; before/after fixes; terminal-only, read-only.
odoo-review
Review a GitHub PR against Odoo PSDU conventions — business need, file-by-file, then full-logic; before/after fixes; terminal-only, read-only.