Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/plugin install code-modernizationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/modernize-assess)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/modernize-assess"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/modernize-assess/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/modernize-assess"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/modernize-assess.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.02194 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00878 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00439 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
modernize-assess scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to modernize-assess — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mode. If $ARGUMENTS starts with --portfolio, run Portfolio mode on the
directory that follows. Otherwise run Single-system mode on $system, the
first token. Flags go after it (<system> --show-secrets): a flag in first place
would be read as the system name.
The code is legacy/$system, often a symlink to where it really lives: say where it points (readlink legacy/$system) in one line before you start. If legacy/$system does not exist, stop and say so: nothing can run without the code, so the fix is /code-modernization:modernize $system --source <path to the code>. Run every subagent in the foreground and wait for its result: never end your turn while one is still running.
Portfolio mode (--portfolio <parent-dir>)
Sweep every immediate subdirectory and produce a heat-map a steering committee can use to sequence a multi-year program.
If the Workflow tool is available (this command is your authorization),
list the subdirectories first (ls -d <parent-dir>/*/ | xargs -n1 basename; the
script has no filesystem access), tell the user the count (30 systems means 30
agents), then run one survey agent per system:
Call it by name (the plugin registers it). If the tool does not know the name, pass scriptPath: "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/portfolio-assess.js" instead:
Workflow({
name: "code-modernization:modernize-portfolio-assess",
args: { parentDir: "<parent-dir>", systems: ["<sub1>", "<sub2>", ...] }
})
Each agent returns a metrics row and the workflow computes the COCOMO index in
code, so every row uses the same formula. If the session dies mid-sweep,
relaunch with resumeFromRunId and finished systems return from cache. Without
the Workflow tool, gather the same row per system yourself.
Per system: SLOC and dominant language (cloc --csv, else scc, else find +
wc -l), file count, complexity measured one way for every system (scc's per-file
complexity summed, divided by KSLOC, and the most complex single file; without scc,
count decision keywords the same way everywhere), dependency freshness (age or pinned-version count of the
manifest), documentation coverage (source files whose opening comment
describes the file, not just a license, and architecture docs present), and the COCOMO index 2.94 × KSLOC^1.10. The
index is a relative size measure for ranking systems, never a timeline or a cost
(it assumes human-team productivity): label the column "index", never print
person-months, a date or a duration.
Write analysis/portfolio.html (dark #1e1e1e background, #d4d4d4 text,
#cc785c accent, system-ui, CSS inline): one row per system, columns System ·
Lang · KSLOC · Files · Complexity per KSLOC · Most complex file · Dep Freshness · Doc
Coverage % · Complexity index · Risk, index and Risk cells graded green to red, and a
2–3 sentence recommendation of which system goes first and why. Tell the user to
open it, then stop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago Changed · -74 lines 4274f473d158
- 1mo ago First seen · 233 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 28bdeb5de2c9
modernize-assess is a command published in the GitHub repository thevibeworks/claude-code-docs (150 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,194 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to modernize-assess, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
reconcile
Check developer guides for documentation drift against recent code changes.
review
Review proposed ADRs for lifecycle progression — accept implemented decisions, deprecate stale ones, archive trivial ones.
audit
Re-audit accepted ADRs against the codebase — verify each still holds, then amend, supersede, or deprecate the ones that don't.
curate
Curate research files — inventory by type, identify stale/superseded candidates, update frontmatter status.
create
Create a new Architecture Decision Record.
from-spec
Extract Architecture Decision Records from a completed spec.