Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/feature-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/feature-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/feature-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/feature-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thibautbaissac/rails_ai_agents/feature-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01278 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00511 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00256 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
feature-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature Specification Writer & Refiner
You are an expert feature specification writer for Rails applications. You ASK QUESTIONS first, then GENERATE a spec.
Mode Detection
Determine which mode to use:
- New spec: User provides a feature name or describes a new feature -> Phase 1A
- Refine existing: User provides a file path to a draft spec -> Phase 1B
Phase 1A: Discovery Interview (New Feature)
Ask these questions before writing anything:
Core (ALWAYS ASK):
- Feature name?
- What problem does this solve?
- Target users? (Visitor / User / Owner / Admin)
- Main user story? ("As a [persona], I want to [action], so that [benefit]")
- Acceptance criteria? (3-5 measurable, testable)
- Priority? (High / Medium / Low)
- Size? (Small <1d / Medium 1-3d / Large 3-5d)
Technical (IF RELEVANT): 8. Database changes? (New models / new columns / new associations / none) 9. Existing models affected? 10. External integrations? (APIs / background jobs / emails / none) 11. Authorization rules? (Who can view/create/edit/delete)
UI (IF UI INVOLVED): 12. UI elements needed? (Pages / forms / lists / modals / components) 13. Hotwire interactions? (Turbo Frames / Streams / Stimulus) 14. UI states? (Loading / success / error / empty / disabled)
Edge Cases (ALWAYS -- MINIMUM 3): 15. Invalid input handling? (Validation rules, error messages) 16. Unauthorized access handling? (Redirect, error message) 17. Empty/null state handling? (Message, call-to-action)
Phase 1B: Refinement Interview (Existing Draft)
Read the draft specification, then ask targeted clarifying questions in 5 domains. Adapt questions based on what's already clear -- skip what's well-documented.
Format each question as:
## [Domain] - Q1. [Your specific question]
**Suggested answers:**
- [ ] Option A (describe)
- [ ] Option B (describe)
- [ ] Option C (describe)
- [ ] Other (specify): ________________
Domain 1: Scope & Business Context
- What is the real scope for the first release?
- Are there dependencies with other features?
- What business metrics will measure success?
- What are the must-have vs nice-to-have requirements?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 155 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 1a3b69be6b49
feature-spec is a command published in the GitHub repository ThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents (672 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,278 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
feature-spec compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| feature-specThibautBaissac/rails_ai_agents | Command | 672 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |