Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thrashr888/AllBeadsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrashr888/allbeads/project-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrashr888/allbeads/project-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thrashr888/allbeads/project-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrashr888/allbeads/project-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thrashr888/allbeads/project-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00751 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00376 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
project-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create a new GitHub repository with AllBeads and plan the work using beads issues. Does not write code - just sets up the project structure and creates the implementation plan.
Workflow
- Gather Requirements - Discuss the project idea with the user
- Create Spec - Write a detailed specification document
- Create Repo - Use
ab context newto create GitHub repo - Create README - Add README.md with project overview and status
- Create Beads - Create epic issues with specs embedded in descriptions
- STOP - Do not write implementation code
The implementation will be handled later by:
- User manually starting work
/handoffworkflow (ab-vlq) triggering agent work- Another session picking up from
bd ready
Why This Workflow?
- Separation of Concerns - Planning and implementation are distinct phases
- Better Handoffs - Beads contain all context needed for implementation
- Interruptible - Work can be picked up across sessions
- Agent-Friendly - Any agent can implement from the beads
Usage
When the user describes a new project idea:
- Ask clarifying questions about requirements
- Write a spec document (can be in AllBeads/specs/ or in the new repo)
- Create the repo:
ab context new <project-name> --private --gitignore <lang> --license <license> - Create README.md with:
- Project overview
- Status: "Planning Phase"
- Planned features table
- Example usage (planned)
- Create beads epics for each phase:
bd create --title="[Phase 1] ..." --type=epic --priority=1 - Add detailed descriptions to beads (specs, requirements, acceptance criteria)
What NOT to Do
- Do NOT create source code files
- Do NOT set up build/test infrastructure
- Do NOT create CI/CD pipelines
- Do NOT implement any features
All implementation should wait for the handoff workflow or explicit user request.
Example Session
User: I want to build a CLI tool that converts markdown to PDF
Agent: Great idea! Let me ask some questions:
- What language? (Go, Rust, Python?)
- Should it support themes/styles?
- Any specific PDF features (TOC, headers/footers)?
User: Go, yes to themes, and TOC would be nice
Agent: Perfect. Let me plan this project...
1. Creating spec document...
2. Creating repo with `ab context new md2pdf --private --gitignore Go --license MIT`
3. Adding README.md with project overview
4. Creating beads:
- [Phase 1] Core CLI structure
- [Phase 2] Markdown parsing
- [Phase 3] PDF generation
- [Phase 4] Theme support
- [Phase 5] TOC generation
Project planned! The beads contain full specs. Implementation can begin via:
- `bd ready` to see available work
- `/handoff` to trigger agent implementation
- Or start manually: `bd update md2pdf-xxx --status=in_progress`
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 92 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 128feec9b90e
project-new is a command published in the GitHub repository thrashr888/AllBeads (8 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 751 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pm-done
Close a todo (TODO-xxx), sync completed.md, refresh overview.
pm-status
Show governance health, wizard next step, all open blocking/high todos, and pending review count. Primary daily entry.
pm-charter
Create, import, discover, approve, or skip project charter. No-arg form is an interactive wizard.
pm-check
Diagnose .pm/ health (missing files, broken audit, stale map, unconfirmed PRD) and repair or increment without overwriting confirmed content.
_closing
A set of closing rules for project-management commands that change the .pm/ project-management folder. It controls the language of summaries and links shown in the final response.
jira-discover-project
Discover JIRA project context for intelligent defaults and usage patterns.