Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThrownLemon/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/local)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/local"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/local/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/local"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/local.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00694 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00069 |
Grade C, and why
local scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
1. **Reject dangerous tokens.** If a value contains `$(`, backticks, `;`, `|`, `&`, `>`, `<`, or starts with `-` (could be mistaken for a flag), refuse and ask the user to rephrase. **Double-quoting does NOT block comman How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Input Safety — apply before any Bash invocation
Treat every $ARGUMENTS.* value as untrusted input. Before passing any value to the Bash tool:
- Reject dangerous tokens. If a value contains
$(, backticks,;,|,&,>,<, or starts with-(could be mistaken for a flag), refuse and ask the user to rephrase. Double-quoting does NOT block command substitution —"$(rm -rf /)"still executes inside double quotes. - Prefer the Bash tool's argv contract over constructed shell strings. When you must use a shell string, single-quote the value and escape embedded single quotes (
'\''), or build the command viaprintf %q. - Any
"$ARGUMENTS.foo"patterns shown below are illustrative. Sanitize the value first; never blindly substitute.
CodeRabbit Local Code Review
Review your local code changes using the CodeRabbit CLI before creating a pull request.
What This Does
This command delegates to the cr-reviewer subagent which will:
-
Check Prerequisites
- Verify CodeRabbit CLI is installed (
coderabbitorcr) - Check authentication status
- Guide through setup if needed
- Verify CodeRabbit CLI is installed (
-
Run Code Review
- Execute
coderabbit review --agentwith specified options - Parse and categorize findings by severity
- Execute
-
Present Results
- Show summary of issues found
- Group by severity (critical, major, minor, trivial)
- Include file paths and line numbers
-
Interactive Fix Loop
- Offer to apply suggested fixes
- Re-run review after fixes to verify
- Continue until all issues resolved or user stops
Arguments
-
type: Review scope
uncommitted- Only unstaged/staged changescommitted- Only committed changes not yet pushedall- Both (default)
-
base: Base branch for comparison
- Auto-detects from
origin/HEADif not specified - Common values:
main,master,develop
- Auto-detects from
Examples
/coderabbit:local
/coderabbit:local --type uncommitted
/coderabbit:local --base develop
/coderabbit:local --type committed --base main
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 0 tokens per session scan C 5fe8128894ac
local is a command published in the GitHub repository ThrownLemon/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 694 tokens. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.