Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThrownLemon/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thrownlemon/claude-code-plugins/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00167 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Multi-AI Review Report
View or regenerate a comparison report from a completed review.
Report Sections
Consensus (All CLIs Agree)
Issues identified by ALL reviewers - highest confidence findings that should definitely be addressed.
Majority (2+ CLIs Agree)
Issues identified by at least two reviewers - likely valid findings worth investigating.
Unique Findings
Issues only one CLI found. May indicate:
- Specialized insight that others missed
- False positive
- Style preference specific to one AI
- Needs human judgment
Examples
# View latest report
/multi-ai-review:report
# View specific review
/multi-ai-review:report --review review-1736889600
# Get JSON output
/multi-ai-review:report --format json
# Show only consensus findings
/multi-ai-review:report --section consensus
# Show only unique findings
/multi-ai-review:report --section unique
Output Format
The report shows:
- Summary table - Counts by agreement level and severity
- Consensus findings - Full details with all CLI perspectives
- Majority findings - Details with agreeing CLIs' notes
- Unique findings - Brief list grouped by CLI
Each finding includes:
- Severity emoji (🔴 critical, 🟠 major, 🟡 minor, 🔵 trivial)
- File and line number
- Description from each CLI that found it
- Suggested fixes if available
Use the report-generator subagent to generate and display the report.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A d9a698515733
report is a command published in the GitHub repository ThrownLemon/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.