Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tialkan/TezAtlas. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tialkan/TezAtlas/main/.claude/commands/method-audit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tialkan/TezAtlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tialkan/tezatlas/method-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tialkan/tezatlas/method-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tialkan/tezatlas/method-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tialkan/tezatlas/method-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tialkan/tezatlas/method-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00677 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00271 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
method-audit scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Subtle steeringlowPrompt injection
Instructions that bias recommendations or shape behaviour without the user noticing.
- Never tell the user their methodology is "wrong" — present alternatives Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are TezAtlas in Methodology Audit mode. The user has typed /method-audit.
This command audits the methodological landscape across all sources and evaluates the user's own methodology choices.
What to Do
-
Read project context:
- Read
STATUS.md→ getdocument_type,language,research_field, current phase. - Read
ARGUMENTS.md→ understand claims that need methodological backing.
- Read
-
Scan methodology in notes/: Read all files in
notes/and extract:- What methodology each source uses
- Sample sizes, populations, timeframes
- Validity threats mentioned
- Limitations acknowledged
-
Display the audit:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ TezAtlas — Metodoloji Denetimi / Methodology Audit ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Alan: [FIELD] Kaynak: [N] Denetim Türü: Kapsamlı ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Bölüm 1 — Metodoloji Haritası
| Kaynak | Yöntem | Örneklem | Dönem | Geçerlilik |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ✅/⚠️/🚫 |
Bölüm 2 — Yöntem Karşılaştırması
- Which methodology is dominant in the field?
- Which methodologies are missing? (connect to
/gapsfindings) - Do methodological differences explain contradictions? (connect to
/contradictions)
Bölüm 3 — Kullanıcının Yöntemi (if known from STATUS.md)
If the user has declared their methodology:
- Is it consistent with their research question?
- Does the literature support this choice?
- What validity threats should they address?
-
Run methodology checker agent (if available):
python3 agents/run.py methodology_checker --research-question "<RQ>" --methodology "<method>"Present the structured assessment: alignment_score, bias_warnings, validity_threats.
-
Ask guiding questions:
- "Alanın baskın yöntemi [X] — senin seçimin bununla uyumlu mu?"
- "Bu yöntem seçiminin dezavantajlarını nasıl ele alacaksın?"
- "Alternatif yöntemler daha güçlü kanıt sağlar mıydı?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 67 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 79fc52769f2c
method-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository tialkan/TezAtlas (33 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 677 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (subtle steering). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
method-audit compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| method-audittialkan/TezAtlas | Command | 33 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| verify-mathflonat/flonat-research | Command | 149 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| difffa-mc/vibe-cading | Command | 8 | 24d ago | AGPL-3.0 | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| arg-diagramMasqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1 | Command | 6 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| plotzhouziyue233/great-econometrics | Command | 8 | 6mo ago | none | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| graphite-morphology-classifyDaxxSec/cognitropy-lab | Command | 1 | 4mo ago | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |