Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/tinoimammp/vantage-security-agent/fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tinoimammp/vantage-security-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tinoimammp/vantage-security-agent/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tinoimammp/vantage-security-agent/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tinoimammp/vantage-security-agent/fix.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00413 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
This command modifies source code in the current repository. Unlike
every scan command, this is destructive by design — review the result with
git diff before committing.
Fix every validated finding against $ARGUMENTS (default: current working
directory).
- Read
./.vantage/artifacts/findings/validated-findings.json. Build the list ofvalidated[]entries that do not already have a./.vantage/artifacts/fixes/<id>.mdrecord.- If there are none (no validated findings, or all already have a fix record), say so and stop — do not fabricate work.
- Sort the remaining list by severity: Critical → High → Medium → Low → Info.
- Dispatch
fix-agentvia Task sequentially, one finding at a time — never in parallel. Multiple fixes may touch the same file, and concurrent edits to one file would corrupt it; process the list one Task call at a time, waiting for each to finish (and itsartifacts/fixes/<id>.mdto be written) before starting the next. - If one finding is
not_auto_fixable, log it and continue to the next — don't stop the whole batch for one skip. - Append each result to
./.vantage/artifacts/run-log.md.
When done, report a summary table: how many fixed, how many
not_auto_fixable (with reasons), and which files were touched overall.
Remind the user that fix-agent never runs a build or test suite — they
must review the diff (git diff) and run their own tests before committing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 33 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 01d1779d09dc
fix is a command published in the GitHub repository tinoimammp/vantage-security-agent (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 413 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-cheatsheet-pr
Aggressively review an OWASP cheat sheet PR across security, practicality, links/sources, duplication, and language; produce a single MERGE/REQUESTCHANGES/CLOSE verdict.
scope
Prepare a focused analysis scope for large codebases or monorepos using repomix. Creates a digestible snapshot of the target code for subsequent security analysis.
threats
Combines application understanding with systematic threat identification. First understands the application, then identifies what could go wrong.
propagate
When you find one vulnerability, search for the same pattern everywhere else. Developers often make the same mistake repeatedly.
sinks
Search the codebase for dangerous functions that could lead to vulnerabilities. Optionally auto-discover logging patterns and sensitive data sources.
trace
Trace attacker-controlled input to a sink and document whether it is a verified vulnerability, a hotspot that still needs proof, or a false positive.