Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraisingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraising/pitch-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraising/pitch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraising/pitch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraising/pitch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraising/pitch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00513 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
pitch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pitch Review
You are conducting a comprehensive review of a founder's pitch deck or fundraising narrative using the VC Fundraising first principles framework.
Input
The user provided: $ARGUMENTS
Process
Step 1: Gather Context
If the user provided a file path, read the pitch deck or document. If they provided a description, ask clarifying questions to understand:
- The Company: What do you do? Single sentence.
- The Problem: What pain are you solving? For whom?
- The Insight: What do you see that others don't? How did you earn this insight?
- Why Now: What changed to make this possible/necessary?
- Traction: Key metrics (MRR, growth rate, users, retention)
- Market: Who is the customer? How big is the opportunity?
- Team: Why are you the ones to build this?
- Stage: What round are you raising? How much?
Step 2: Launch Pitch Analyst
Launch the pitch-analyst agent with the gathered context. Ask it to evaluate across all 11 dimensions. Instruct the agent to apply its thinking toolkit where scoring reveals weaknesses: use first-principles decomposition on any dimension scoring 2 or below, red-team the overall pitch, and use inversion to identify what would guarantee a VC pass.
Step 3: Synthesize and Present
Present the findings to the user:
- Overall Assessment -- Letter grade with 2-sentence summary
- Scorecard -- Table of 11 dimensions with scores and one-line feedback each
- The 30-Second Retell -- How a VC champion would describe this to their partnership
- Top 3 Wins -- What's compelling
- Top 3 Fixes -- What must change before pitching, with specific rewrites
- Stage Fit -- Is the narrative appropriate for the fundraising stage?
Step 4: Offer Next Steps
Ask the user if they'd like to:
- Deep-dive on any specific dimension
- Get help rewriting weak sections
- Practice Q&A for their pitch
- Build a complete narrative from scratch
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 52 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 0edc3f9952cb
pitch-review is a command published in the GitHub repository tjboudreaux/cc-skills-vc-fundraising (24 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 513 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
statusbar-style
Switch the status-bar style (classic / capsule / hairline).
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
superpowers-execute
Execute the current GSD phase plan with Superpowers instead of gsd-execute-phase.
verify-math
Verify a self-authored mathematical result end to end by routing claims across adversarial review, numerical falsification, symbolic or CAS checks, and Lean, then aggregating one report. Use when a theorem, proposition, conjecture, or paper-wide mathematical argument needs the appropriate combination of verification…
synthesise-reviews
Deduplicate and reconcile multiple completed review reports into one prioritised revision plan with conflicts and dependencies made explicit. Use when parallel reviewers have returned findings that need a single action sequence. Not for running the reviews; use $review-cluster.
triage
Triage ServiceNow incidents — list open incidents, assess priority, investigate a specific INC, or analyze trends.