Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tomdwipo/claude-soul. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tomdwipo/claude-soul/main/.claude/commands/feature-report.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomdwipo/claude-soulWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tomdwipo/claude-soul/feature-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tomdwipo/claude-soul/feature-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tomdwipo/claude-soul/feature-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tomdwipo/claude-soul/feature-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tomdwipo/claude-soul/feature-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02019 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00808 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
feature-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature Report Command (Phase 2: Post-Implementation)
Generate a compliance feature report for: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Step 1: Gather PRD & Design Inputs
Primary inputs for feature reports are PRD (Confluence), Figma design, and actual implemented codebase — NOT Jira tickets.
1a. PRD from Confluence (Primary Source of Truth)
If $ARGUMENTS contains a Confluence URL or page ID:
- Use
mcp__atlassian__getConfluencePageto fetch PRD content - Extract: requirements, acceptance criteria, business rules — this is what implementation is compared against
If $ARGUMENTS describes a feature name (no URL):
- Use
mcp__atlassian__searchConfluenceUsingCqlto search for the PRD in Confluence - Fetch the matching page with
mcp__atlassian__getConfluencePage
1b. Figma Design
If $ARGUMENTS contains a Figma URL:
- Use
mcp__figma__get_file_nodesto fetch design details
If user provides screenshot images directly:
- Analyze the screenshots for UI compliance verification
1c. QA TRD
If $ARGUMENTS contains --qa-trd or a QA TRD Confluence URL:
- Fetch QA TRD from Confluence to enrich QA_ALIGNMENT.md
- Map QA test scenarios against implementation
1d. Jira (Optional — for ticketing/tracking only)
If $ARGUMENTS contains a Jira ticket ID (e.g., PROJ-1234):
- Use
mcp__atlassian__getJiraIssueto fetch ticket summary, epic, linked issues - Use
mcp__jira-attachment__list_attachments+download_all_images+download_all_videosfor attachments - If videos found, use
mcp__video-to-image__extract_frames_by_count(count: 5) to extract key frames - Note: Jira is used for tracking context and ticket references only, not as primary requirement source
Step 2: Analyze Implemented Code
- Read the existing TRD at
.docs/trd/TRD-{Feature-Name}.mdif it exists - Search codebase for all files mentioned in the TRD or related to the feature
- Read actual implemented files to verify what was built
- Compare implementation against PRD requirements from Confluence
- Identify any gaps or deviations from the original spec
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 296 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3c7ccb76a1a8
feature-report is a command published in the GitHub repository tomdwipo/claude-soul (24 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,019 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
feature-report compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| feature-reporttomdwipo/claude-soul | Command | 24 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |