Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/review-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tommymorgan/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/review-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tommymorgan/claude-plugins/review-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00283 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00142 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
tommymorgan:review-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Plan
Review a plan file using the expert panel. This is a convenience wrapper around /review-features.
Workflow
Step 1: Find Plan File
If argument provided, use it:
$ARGUMENTS
If no argument, find the most recent plan file:
- Search for
plans/*.mdin current project - Sort by date in filename (YYYY-MM-DD pattern)
- Use most recent
Step 2: Invoke Review Features
Pass the plan file to /review-features:
/tommymorgan:review-features <plan_file_path>
The expert panel will:
- Extract Gherkin scenarios from the plan
- Detect context from content
- Run 13 domain experts
- Provide prioritized recommendations
Step 3: Display Results
The review output from /review-features is displayed directly.
Notes
This command exists for backwards compatibility and discoverability.
All functionality is in /review-features, which also accepts:
.featurefiles- Directories of feature files
- Glob patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 54 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 43ac59e3ebc9
tommymorgan:review-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository tommymorgan/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 283 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.