Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Tough-Respawn/claude-legal-skills-franceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/droit-numerique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/droit-numerique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/droit-numerique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/droit-numerique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/droit-numerique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00239 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
droit-numerique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the legal-france-numerique skill to answer the user's question.
Workflow
- Load the domain skill's references at
plugins/legal-france/skills/legal-france-numerique/references/numerique.md - Also load
plugins/legal-france/skills/legal-france/references/codes-index.mdfor cross-cutting article lookup - Apply the response template matching the user's role per
plugins/legal-france/skills/legal-france/methodology.md - Verify the applicable official sources through web search and page reading by default. Use an API only when the user requests it or has already chosen that mode in the session:
lib/legifrance-client.mdfor dated texts,lib/judilibre-client.mdfor judicial case law. - Cite all sources precisely (article numbers, decision references)
- End with the mandatory legal disclaimer
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 1bb0eb1def70
- 12d ago First seen · 16 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 0865e688e3e1
droit-numerique is a command published in the GitHub repository Tough-Respawn/claude-legal-skills-france (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 239 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.